I mean it can't hurt, but I just don't buy it. Shooting your new rifle thirty times and cleaning it a lot in between shots is....not going to do anything special to steel.
I mean it can't hurt, but I just don't buy it. Shooting your new rifle thirty times and cleaning it a lot in between shots is....not going to do anything special to steel.
Breaking in a barrel has no bearing on accuracy.
It ‘may’ have an impact on the rate at which a barrel may copper foul.
I personally haven’t bothered last couple premium barrels.
I’ve never understood why a thorough clean between range sessions doesn’t yield the same net end result. It’s not like a barrel can count in 5s or 10s.
Trick is not to over think some of this shooting vudoo and that barrel manufacturers are in the business of selling more barrels, course they want you to burn through its lifetime as quick as possible.
Think of the barrel on your rifle like the tyres on your car, they are a consumable item. If your barrel outlasts you, clearly you’re not planning to shoot it nearly enough !
I see your point there. Manufacturers do say its now a waste of time with hammer forged barrels.
Maybe a few extra cleans and passes would improve it.
Thing is, load pressure would also affect rhe barrel at this stage also, yet does anyone ever bother the dial back their powder say 15%?
My understanding of break-in is that it is all about copper fouling interfering with the surface oxidation of the throat / barrel.
I would guess that over the years there have been 10 new barrels shot for the first time by people at my range.
Of those 10, I guess half have hardly made a green mark on the first patch then nothing and half stained at least five patches and one was green for ten shots and needed fifteen to run clean ( A tikka)
There is some merit in statements that barrel steel molecules lay in one direction after the machining process.....even in cut rifling the metal is torn away at a microscopic level. I have recently done an experiment with a Krieger 284 barrel 32mm parallel chambered in 7mm SAUM. It had done 653 rounds and started to produce the odd flyer so I cut it back and reversed the chamber. It copper fouled terribly for the first 180 rounds and is coming right now on the target after 200 rounds.
The muzzle end which was then re-chambered was pristine, but the fouling was the full length and in particular the original throat end was the worst as expected. I think this suggests there was some disturbance of the molecular surface from the direction of the original bullet travel.
If that disturbance of the surface is what has happened I would suggest some care is required in the treatment of a new barrel. The Howa recommendations are good advice, and as @zimmer has stated the barrel manufacturers provide their procedures because they care more about their reputation of providing good products than wanting their clients to wear out a barrel quickly so another can be sold
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese....
Problem with cleaning with a patch as evidence can be a false positive......a barrel can only be determined to be clean with a bore scope. How many times have we heard a gun has lost accuracy and hear anecdotally of a gunsmith restoring it with a good clean.
I have used many copper solvents like Hoppes #2, Sweets, KG line of products, many carbon solvents, and bore pastes of many descriptions, and thinking that must be clean now only to find upon inspection with a borescope it is not the case.
Just because the patch is clean doesn't mean the bore is clean. Try this little experiment for yourself to believe it .......use your usual cleaning method until you are happy the bore is clean, then using a bronze brush and Hoppes give the bore 20 strokes, leave it overnight and I would be willing to bet the patch is fouled, and it could be both blue and black.
Make sure you wash your brush out with a petroleum based solvent immediately otherwise next time you use the brush it will be on smaller calibre....best to leave it in petrol in a glass jar and change to solvent regularly.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese....
I suspect that maybe the case with Hoppes and Sweets, but Boretech Copper is the best and seems to be going good after some time. I have decanted it into a smaller bottle and top it up occasionally from the larger one meaning the larger one gets opened rarely hopefully preserving it. That may be quite incorrect as I suspect it is chemically constituted and there are no solvents to evaporate, however I will continue to decant it.
Interestingly the Sweets being ammonia based still is quite pungent, but largely ineffective or noticeably slower when used on a cotton bud on copper at the muzzle while Boretech removes it very effectively and quickly....a good test.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese....
I clean the barrel then shoot it.
Get my zero then put about 50 rounds down the barrel, then copper clean.
Then keep shooting till accuracy decreases, the hard copper clean. With just a hoppes #9 on a pull though before being put away
Using Tapatalk
I've always used nylon brushes when using copper cutting solutions as brass brushes I believe taint and give false indication of copper being present and you could spend all bloody night cleaning.
I've had the wire that holds the nylon bristles on give a blue false copper reading
I now use nickel-plated and aluminum jags and use a stainless steel rod....no copper 'false positives'
A good job and a good wife has been the ruin of many a good hunter.
Well guys thanks for the input. After reading what has been posted and some web searches I think I'll probably go with what I've done in the past.
Thanks.
Shane
" 60% of the time it works. 80% of the time it doesn't. " BRIAN FM
Here's how one of USA's very top F Class shooters breaks a barrel in. I cannot see many of use here, given the component situation going his way.
https://youtu.be/tOUK_zHt4hQ
@sjjs....just use a bronze brush with Hoppes (sorry not #2 s/be #9) or any other copper solvent rarely....I suggested that as an experiment to be left overnight as Hoppes will do no damage to a bore unlike some solvents. It was to demonstrate if mainly carbon fouling was still present after cleaning indicated a clean bore. The best method is to use a carbon remover with a bronze brush. It is not a carbon solvent as carbon is indestructible so the product needs to agitate the carbon molecules and separate them from the other burnt residues and the barrel steel with a brush. Those products should not be left overnight in a barrel.
To avoid false positives from copper solvents use only those solvents with an aluminum jag etc (as mentioned above) and patches...there is no benefit to brushing with copper solvents......try a cotton bud in the muzzle end with something like Boretech for example and you will see it disappear before your eyes.
Last edited by Longranger; 26-02-2022 at 10:59 PM.
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese....
Bookmarks