Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42
Like Tree43Likes

Thread: Best bang for buck 222/223 action

  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,301
    Quote Originally Posted by Ground Control View Post
    The down range performance of the .223 has been advanced over the last decade or so with the move to faster twist barrels and longer/heavier projectiles , but to take advantage of that you need to be able to load them long if you want .
    Actions/Magazines that allow a longer cartridge OAL are almost a necessity in my opinion
    .
    And being able to find those long projectiles in the country!!!

  2. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Friwi View Post
    And being able to find those long projectiles in the country!!!
    Thought Targex did some heavier pills that @Tahr used?

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Micky Duck View Post
    its funny when you read about the early .222s that hit our shores...there was one of them on this forum a while back....medium action length so strong as heck...apparently some of the reloads were hotrodded to heck....... one thing for sure,it would solve the mag length and feeding long projectiles issue.
    Well, Remington, Howa and others use their 'short action' that'll take a 2.8" or longer loaded round (308 family).

    To feed at 222/223 size case, a block is put into the magazine box and shorter follower used. However this takes COAL down to about 2.3".

    With some modification (removing the block in the mag box and replacing with a smaller one) you can get 2.5" COAL rounds into the magazine.

    Worth reading this thread: Start At The Fucking Start............... | As Real As It Gets

    Just check your barrel has a generous throat before trying to send some downrange

  4. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Micky Duck View Post
    its funny when you read about the early .222s that hit our shores...there was one of them on this forum a while back....medium action length so strong as heck...apparently some of the reloads were hotrodded to heck....... one thing for sure,it would solve the mag length and feeding long projectiles issue.
    Well, Remington, Howa and others use their 'short action' that'll take a 2.8" or longer loaded round (308 family).

    Name:  Screenshot_20220824-154742_Chrome.jpg
Views: 233
Size:  335.4 KB

    To feed at 222/223 size case, a block is put into the magazine box and shorter follower used. However this takes COAL down to about 2.3".

    With some modification (removing the block in the mag box and replacing with a smaller one) you can get 2.5" COAL rounds into the magazine.

    Worth reading this thread: Start At The Fucking Start............... | As Real As It Gets

    Just check your barrel has a generous throat before trying to send some downrange

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    12,775
    Quote Originally Posted by caberslash View Post
    Thought Targex did some heavier pills that @Tahr used?
    Yes, Targex do an 80grn that I use. Unfortunately he is out of jacket material for them so wont be making any more 80's for quite a while.
    caberslash likes this.
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NI
    Posts
    12,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Ground Control View Post
    The down range performance of the .223 has been advanced over the last decade or so with the move to faster twist barrels and longer/heavier projectiles , but to take advantage of that you need to be able to load them long if you want .
    Actions/Magazines that allow a longer cartridge OAL are almost a necessity in my opinion.
    The Howa’s are the best “ bang for your buck “ at the moment, but I prefer the 1500 SA over the mini .
    Not exclusively. The 77 grn Sierra tipped match king is designed for a short AR 2.3" mag (Tikka length) and they are exceptional performers on deer.
    Out beyond ideas of wrongdoing, and right-doing, there is a field. I will meet you there.
    - Rumi

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,214
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagheera View Post
    The Sako 85 has several worthwhile improvements over the Vixen.
    Like being very heavy...

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    kaiapoi
    Posts
    7,127
    what about some of the euro types that Graeme Champion sells sometimes? seem to recall maybe a sauer or carl gustav single stack magazine models that looked quite nice?
    do these fall into the hard to get bits for category/

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Central Otago
    Posts
    2,268
    The Howa is hands-down the best value for money, a good design and well made. The Ruger American is also a good action but needs some work to get running nicely. Zastava's are OK but a bit sloppy in the action. CZ's are not a particularly good design but quite well made. None of them are as good as my old pre-Cindy Ranger AR was! (sub 1/2 MOA consistently). My current Tikka CTR is good, but not quite as good (1/2 t0 3/4 MOA).
    csmiffy, dannyb and m101a1 like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 10/22 Accuracy Improvement (best bang for your buck)
    By Dermastor in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 08-10-2017, 07:15 PM
  2. best bang for buck ?
    By sakkaranz in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 22-08-2014, 11:05 PM
  3. Rifle weightloss : best bang for your buck ?
    By ebf in forum Projects and Home Builds
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 22-11-2013, 06:14 PM
  4. Bang for buck range finder.
    By CreepingDeath in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 23-09-2012, 10:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!