Do you put the +0.20 in the front ring on the bottom half and the -0.20 in the back on the bottom half or the other way round? I'm confused
Do you put the +0.20 in the front ring on the bottom half and the -0.20 in the back on the bottom half or the other way round? I'm confused
And you WON'T get 20 MOA like they say.
All depends on rings spacing etc - and I'd be damned if you could get 20 MOA out of mine in anyway let alone actually mounting a scope
They are nice rings - just a bit miffed that they say 20 MOA where in fact its not ... I needed 20 hence why I brought them lol
Yeah I like them, just did it then so its pretty quick. Hope this rain clears for tomorrow...
Are you heading up to Leith Valley tomorrow Wildmann
Hope yo, OJR thought you might be too. Got a spare hand? I have about 5 rifles that need sorting...
2 spare hands. I'm going to function test the AR and do some 6.5 loads if I can be arsed loading them some time. I'll be up there about 1 I guess.
and by function test I mean "blast randomly at shit"
I got the burris rings too. Got roughly 15MOA out of them.
Those marks are thou aren't they?? in a short action its close to MOA but in a long its not so close.... - under the front ring + under the rear
They are fractions of an inch...
accurateshooter.com article
Here's a link to a maths formula to work out how much gain you will get from the inserts.
http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com/...ation-changes/
It looks like the distance the rings are apart is the key. For my 94mm ring to ring distance, I should get very lose to 40moa using .020 front and back.
Question for the guys who are using these. Do you find that the inserts hold the scope securely, any issues ?
Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute
Bookmarks