Thread: Burris Signature HD 3-15's first day out.

I put a delta titanium 4-20 up against my old zeiss MC 6-20. Wasn't impressed with the delta at all. no where as bright at high power, and surprisingly it was very distorted at low power. Only the middle was in focus.

Seems to be the opposite to what everyone else thinks which is strange? Especially seeing as others prefer them to swarovski z5s and leupold vx5s etc

Originally Posted by superdiver

Seems to be the opposite to what everyone else thinks which is strange? ..

The relevant word here is "subjective". Context/lighting/background/focus adjustment can all play a part.

In this context, it's hardly like you're comparing a $20 ChungWah with a top end Euro. They're all pretty good to start with.

Originally Posted by superdiver

Seems to be the opposite to what everyone else thinks which is strange? Especially seeing as others prefer them to swarovski z5s and leupold vx5s etc

My guess is
Misunderstanding on what SF does - or needed adjustment
Failing that - something wrong with scope

Originally Posted by NZVarminter

I put a delta titanium 4-20 up against my old zeiss MC 6-20. Wasn't impressed with the delta at all. no where as bright at high power, and surprisingly it was very distorted at low power. Only the middle was in focus.

I didn't find that at all with the 4-24 x 50 or the 1.5 -9 x45. They were super clear and focused perfectly through the mag range, we had one on a rifle and one on a rifle stock to compare with the other scopes that were on rifles. We did change diopter focus and side focus for each of the three blokes in turn