ok tried it today with a primed case spent just under an hour and couldn't get it to go off I would of nearly fuked my scope and rifle if I got rougher with it
Printable View
Seems to me you comment is full of contradiction.
Mechanical safety's DO work. Try and fire my T3 with the safety engaged. I have known shooters to nearly straighten their trigger trying to shoot game with the safety on. Americans firearm manufacturers condone their safety devices and in the liability capital of the world, they would be stupid to make one that doesn't work. The only reason it will not work is if it is not engaged.
I am VERY conscious of where I point a firearm - loaded or not, and having (and using) a safety has not and does not alter that fact.
If it is not possible to push the firing pin back when a rifle is decocked, how is the inertia from a fall going to push it back enough to detonate the primer???
You are correct. Firearms safety is about good habits, not misguided paranoia.
Thanks, I will. As I said in a previous post, when hunting with others I always have an empty chamber until I am ready to fire. This is not because I feel how I normally hunt is unsafe, rather it is for the other persons peace of mind. I would expect the same in return.
Interesting...I'm happy to resign that one to a theoretical high road. Thanks Northdude, I hope your scope reticles aren't shaking around loose after your testing.
How about the old chestnut of the "half cock" bolt position. Safe? I find that when moved down a little with the trigger pulled it will slam fire. I think this could inadvertently happen in the bush and would only use it in combo action with the safety on.
Combination
Should I stop using the hand brake on my car
As long as your car is pointed in safe direction ;-)
NZ is the only country in the world that uses a "half cock". Every where else in the world uses the safety.
To solve the issue just get a Blaser, the decocker does just that, decocks the firing pin.
I've had some advice from more than one person that I should set aside my Sako obsession, and consider one of NZHunter's carbon stocked, T3 based builds. So interested (and appreciative) of any informed views on that?
You get the weight and performances of the sako at a much cheaper price.
Just start with a factory fluted tikka( cheapest weight/price, and cheaper than a carbon barrel or a barrel fluted afterward), get a carbon stock on it and you can get the bolt fluted if You want. Barrel cut at whatever suit your boat , suppressed eventually, and the rest of the money can go toward a very good scope and the amo.
If you already own a sako just get a carbon f stock for it
Talking of stocks........
There are better options IMO if you want to go Sako, than shortening a Finlite or an '85 Hunter.
This is THE nicest Sako I've handled, available in NZ and in .308. No need to chop, and easily threaded by removing the factory open sights and blanking the threaded holes that are exposed with grub screws.
Medium profile factory fluted barrel, nice soft touch stock, points beautifully.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y20...6119C2BB6B.jpg
A competent gunsmith should be able thread it without shortening it, and fit an 'invisible' thread protector that will allow you to refit the factory sights if you decide to sell it down the track.
I'm sure @10-Ring will chime in if you want load data etc.
B
You are supposed to maintain your weapon...
The black bear from sako is very nice but might be a bit heavy for what you want to do?
Specially when hunting in Stewart island...
How ever I got two customers sakos this week, a 222 L461 and an A2 in 243, both with original barrels and their bore where in immaculate conditions inside.
The bore on chrome moly barrels take a little extra effort, like a minute or two. In damp conditions just pull a lightly coated oil patch through the barrel before beddy byes and a clean patch through in the morning. Nothing that hunters haven't being doing for over a hundred years. Stainless will rust too but not as fast as CM. I've seen a few SS bores that were pitted; it's not the same stainless as the kitchen sink is made of.
Personally, I would never base the purchase of a rifle on whether it's stainless or not.
I am rethinking my attitude to weight having recently gone from tikka to a Blaser. It's 500 g heavier (4.6kg v 4.1 all up). It's easier to shoot. Have yet to take it on an extended walk but was up and down some steep hills yesterday and can't say I really noticed a difference.