Thread: a cat endorsed onto your e cat

Originally Posted by ishoot10s

Beavis I think it comes down to what each AO is prepared to do, how they interpret the Act and importantly how they see you (judge your character). They used to have some latitude I think, and only certain cases or requests had to be referred to the Manager Licensing and Vetting. I've always treated my AO's with respect, never made demands or pointed out facts of Law. I simply make polite requests and comply with their instructions. Recently I towed one's vehicle out of a bog at a range day. I haven't called in that favour and I never would. But those days of them having the latitude to be accommodating are dwindling, and this recent case is a classic example.

How fit and proper can you get? I'd like it to be consistent and black and white. I'm a straight up person and don't think you should have to suck up to somebody and bow down to their opinion to get something you aren't expressly forbidden from having. In case people have forgotten, an arms officer is a public servant. Our collective taxes help pay their wages. They are there to do a job. You shouldn't need to be in an old boys club, or "the right" district to get a piece of paper.

And in case your wondering I get on fine with the local AO. We have wildly differing opinions on firearm ownership, but we have a good working relationship.