Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19
Like Tree9Likes

Thread: Determining mil value at different magnification??

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    1,686
    I don't mind the MIL/yards or MOA/meters as it is just an angular adjustment based on a distance. What is tricky is the MIL based reticle with MOA based adjustments.

    There is a work around though - with a 2nd focal plane reticle you can adjust the scope power until the reticle matchs a MOA based scale. With @GWH example with a MIL based reticle true at 14x then 1MIL on the reticle will be:
    • 2MOA at 24x
    • 3MOA at 16x
    • 4MOA at 12x

    Personally I would set the scope on one of these powers instead of automatically using the highest scope power so I can "measure the fall of shot correction using the reticle and adjust from there. Far more helpful when dialling a windage or holding a windage correction.

    To adjust for a target past the usable elevation adjustment in the scope I would do this - Lets say I needed 30.75MOA for my bullet to hit a target at 1000m but I only had enough elevation to dial 28MOA. I would dial 27.75MOA and then set the scope to 16x and use the first MILDOT under the center of the reticle i.e. 27.75 + 3.0 = 30.75. To give me more usable click adjustment range at that distance I could also dial 24.75MOA and, with the scope set on 16x, use the second MILDOT under the center of the reticle.
    gadgetman, Ackley and GWH like this.
    You cannot miss fast enough!
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GPREventsNZ
    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/sgil045

  2. #17
    #KnowsFuckAll Dorkus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Mangawhai
    Posts
    1,310
    I'm going to point the pointy bit at the target and pull the trigger. If it hits then I'm a winner, if it misses then I'll aim a bit higher or twist the twisty bit a few times.
    "I heard Jesus did cocaine on a night out. Eyes wide-open, dialated, but he's fine now. And if his father ever finds out, then he'd probably knock his lights out...
    Gets a little messy in heaven "
    - Venbee

  3. #18
    Member Marty Henry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tararua
    Posts
    7,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Dorkus View Post
    I'm going to point the pointy bit at the target and pull the trigger. If it hits then I'm a winner, if it misses then I'll aim a bit higher or twist the twisty bit a few times.
    Thats the approach, of course my 303s tangent sights are calibrated out to 2000 yards so theres no guesswork involved, except actually trying to see the target.

  4. #19
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillie View Post
    I don't mind the MIL/yards or MOA/meters as it is just an angular adjustment based on a distance. What is tricky is the MIL based reticle with MOA based adjustments.

    There is a work around though - with a 2nd focal plane reticle you can adjust the scope power until the reticle matchs a MOA based scale. With @GWH example with a MIL based reticle true at 14x then 1MIL on the reticle will be:
    • 2MOA at 24x
    • 3MOA at 16x
    • 4MOA at 12x

    Personally I would set the scope on one of these powers instead of automatically using the highest scope power so I can "measure the fall of shot correction using the reticle and adjust from there. Far more helpful when dialling a windage or holding a windage correction.

    To adjust for a target past the usable elevation adjustment in the scope I would do this - Lets say I needed 30.75MOA for my bullet to hit a target at 1000m but I only had enough elevation to dial 28MOA. I would dial 27.75MOA and then set the scope to 16x and use the first MILDOT under the center of the reticle i.e. 27.75 + 3.0 = 30.75. To give me more usable click adjustment range at that distance I could also dial 24.75MOA and, with the scope set on 16x, use the second MILDOT under the center of the reticle.
    Perfect, thanks @Gillie most helpful

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. True magnification
    By Taff in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 20-06-2016, 09:39 PM
  2. High magnification optic for 22lr
    By Thedirge in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-01-2016, 05:59 PM
  3. Magnification ring on a bushnell ar 3x12~40mm scope to stiff to use
    By steven in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-11-2015, 06:44 AM
  4. Forum view magnification setting?
    By Ryan in forum Questions, Comments, Suggestions, Testing.
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-07-2014, 12:20 AM
  5. What magnification scope??
    By Proneshooter in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 19-05-2014, 09:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!