Hi Cam, I think you may have touched on the problem here. I was talking about the Monarch and Majestic in 243.
I reckon the chambers were 'sloppy' and a certain amount of rubbish and blood got in and baked onto the chamber walls. I don't know if this is the reason but it is a theory I have had for a long time. I am no gunsmith but I am thinking maybe a better fitting chamber would have scraped a lot of the shit off as you chambered the shell. I have never had chambering problems before or since as I had with those two rifles.
We used to joke about accidently trying to chamber a reload from either of those rifles into the Sako's how you would chuck it away thinking it was .270.
Could be,mine was certainly a sloppy chamber! I think it was probably borderline dangerous how much the brass stretched.
Sent from my GT-S5360T using Tapatalk 2
"Hunting and fishing" fucking over licenced firearms owners since ages ago.
308Win One chambering to rule them all.
I agree 'Toby' the steel wool wouldn't do the chamber much good but we didn't have a lot of choice we had to make every fine day count.
It would take us a day to walk out of the block, a day to drive to town buy a new rifle or get the old one fixed and a day to walk back in to the block. Field Officers were notoriously touchy about you being off your block too often. I was bad enough that on two occasions I looked through my scope and found they had become goldfish bowls.
Did the early Sako's have an inherent fault in that the were equipped with Bofor's steel micro groove barrels.
My Marlin 795 is very picky with what ammo it likes to run/cycle, unfortunately it seems to only really like CCI or Lapua. Lucky CCI Subs are so easy to get
Also all mine seem to explode each time I squeeze the trigger, lucky for me they only seem to spit bits in one direction
Bookmarks