Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: E cat 762mm length question

  1. #1
    Member Burb122's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    966

    E cat 762mm length question

    Looking for an answer here. If you have a registered e cat firearm and put a collapsable/folding stock on it and once folded or collapsed goes under 762mm it's illegal right? A no can do. ?

  2. #2
    Member Banana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    592
    Police policy is to measure with the stock unfolded/extended, but police policy isn't law.
    res and Sasquatch like this.

  3. #3
    Terminator Products Kiwi Greg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Nelson
    Posts
    6,697
    If its shorter than 762mm is it a Pistol ?
    Contact me for reloading components, brass, projectiles, powder, primers, etc

    http://terminatorproducts.co.nz/

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Terminat...?feature=guide

  4. #4
    DPT
    DPT is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    522
    Yeah its a pistol under 762mm so you cant legaly have it on your E

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    First, I don'y know answer to initial question, but if it falls then into pistol category would require "B" endorsement, "E" does not cover pistols.
    Might be wrong here but normally allows you to go to around 10.5" barrel on say an Ar with a standard retractable?

  6. #6
    Member jim160's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    3,112
    Quote Originally Posted by jackson21 View Post
    First, I don'y know answer to initial question, but if it falls then into pistol category would require "B" endorsement, "E" does not cover pistols.
    Might be wrong here but normally allows you to go to around 10.5" barrel on say an Ar with a standard retractable?
    They are pistols if they are shorter than 762mm. Those ar15 rifles are actually pistols not rifles.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    Yes looks like would have to be around 12.5" min on a fixed stock to keep under that 762mm length, if brake included in length would have to be fixed type.

  8. #8
    Member jim160's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    3,112
    Quote Originally Posted by jackson21 View Post
    Yes looks like would have to be around 12.5" min on a fixed stock to keep under that 762mm length, if brake included in length would have to be fixed type.
    Yep. Plenty of people have got them with 10in barrels thinking they are A cat, not realising they have brought a pistol. Anyway, why you would want one with a 10inch barrel is beyond me.

  9. #9
    Member 300CALMAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    NZISTAN
    Posts
    5,236
    Quote Originally Posted by jim160 View Post
    Yep. Plenty of people have got them with 10in barrels thinking they are A cat, not realising they have brought a pistol. Anyway, why you would want one with a 10inch barrel is beyond me.
    Unless your into door kicking, 10 inches means lots of flame and noise with quite a drop in MV. I have never fired one but being net to one on the range i have to say they sound nasty and seem to spit out un-burned powder.

    Not having one to measure, is a collapsing stock version with 14.5 inch under the legal length when collapsed? Mus t be a lot of those out there.

  10. #10
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,517
    a 10.5" with a suppressor is a fuck of a lot more handy than a 16" or whatever with a suppressor....
    Sasquatch likes this.

  11. #11
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,891
    Uh but when Joe Green was in charge of gun matters he openly stated that E category guns are measured with the stock extended. I believe the current guy states the same thing. So basically it is a grey area. There is confusion because there are many E cat registered guns that fall well under 762mm with the stock folded. Also, a folding or telescoping stock is specifically recognized as an MSSA feature.
    Tommy likes this.

  12. #12
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,517
    the arms act only says "under 762mm in length", which isn't defined at all, could go either way, "length" to me in plain english is "the longest possible distance between the ends of an object", i.e., with stock fully extended
    Jexla likes this.

  13. #13
    Member Beavis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,891
    That is basically what the English dictionary says. MSSA's also are not made or adapted to be fired with one hand, they are clearly designed to be fired from the shoulder, with the stock extended.

  14. #14
    Member Banana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    592
    Quote Originally Posted by 300CALMAN View Post
    Not having one to measure, is a collapsing stock version with 14.5 inch under the legal length when collapsed?
    With a bare muzzle, yes.

  15. #15
    Member jim160's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    3,112
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    the arms act only says "under 762mm in length", which isn't defined at all, could go either way, "length" to me in plain english is "the longest possible distance between the ends of an object", i.e., with stock fully extended
    And that could be also identified as to how the Police find it. if its fully retracted then that would be the length. Personally I wouldn't want to spend 10K fighting it in Court. Cause you would have to prove it. At the very least they would probably revoke the licence and see what happens in Court. If they determine its a breach, then there goes the licence.
    But in your theory, then a folding stock on an AK47 would be fine as its measured at its longest length. I certainly don't see that working out or the Police allowing that.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Minimum legal barrel length and overall length for firearms
    By A.J.P. in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 27-07-2015, 12:30 PM
  2. Quick Barrell length question.
    By Happy in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 15-08-2013, 04:33 PM
  3. Making Medium action length T3's into Big action length T3's
    By Kitto in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24-06-2012, 10:05 PM
  4. Quick case length question
    By jakewire in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25-02-2012, 01:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!