Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct ZeroPak


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 95
Like Tree22Likes

Thread: From E-Cat to A-Cat?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    You can't use knifes as an example, if there was a E-Cat on every kitchen bench how do you think that would affect the murder rates for knife vs E-Cat. Knives are more easily obtainable by anyone hence the higher rate of use in crime. I would think the restrictions on firearm ownership has a direct link to how often they're used in crime.

    The point is that, in the USA:
    -in most states an AR for example is easy to get - just go and buy it
    -if they're a felon and can't pass a background check in a store it's still not hard to get if you just go and buy one face-to-face in a private transfer eg the retardedly named and misunderstood "gunshow loophole"
    -if "these type of guns" attract "the wrong sort of people" then surely "the wrong sort of people" would make that minor effort to get them
    -Overall murder rate with all rifles is less than 4% in the USA, that's not "ARs" or "MSSAs" it's "All rifles"
    -Clearly not too many murders are making the minimal effort that they'd have to make to get those guns if they really were all attracted to them any more than they are to any weapon.

    I think "the wrong sort of person" is attracted to any weapon, none more so than others really

    "the wrong sort of person" in Boston was attracted to a pressure cooker full of cut up fireworks

  2. #2
    Member Savage1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    3,530
    Quote Originally Posted by gimp View Post
    The point is that, in the USA:
    -in most states an AR for example is easy to get - just go and buy it
    -if they're a felon and can't pass a background check in a store it's still not hard to get if you just go and buy one face-to-face in a private transfer eg the retardedly named and misunderstood "gunshow loophole"
    -if "these type of guns" attract "the wrong sort of people" then surely "the wrong sort of people" would make that minor effort to get them
    -Overall murder rate with all rifles is less than 4% in the USA, that's not "ARs" or "MSSAs" it's "All rifles"
    -Clearly not too many murders are making the minimal effort that they'd have to make to get those guns if they really were all attracted to them any more than they are to any weapon.

    I think "the wrong sort of person" is attracted to any weapon, none more so than others really

    "the wrong sort of person" in Boston was attracted to a pressure cooker full of cut up fireworks
    The USA is hard to use as an example as pistols are so easily obtained over there making firearms crime up but rifle specific crime lower. It's shown that the people that go on rampages either get or try to get Military styled weapons.

    To be honest I don't think the USA is any kind of example to follow, but it would be stupid not to observe and learn from any mistakes they have made.

    Enough from me.

  3. #3
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    The USA is hard to use as an example as pistols are so easily obtained over there making firearms crime up but rifle specific crime lower. It's shown that the people that go on rampages either get or try to get Military styled weapons.

    To be honest I don't think the USA is any kind of example to follow, but it would be stupid not to observe and learn from any mistakes they have made.

    Enough from me.
    I don't think it is shown. A "MSSA" is realistically as easy to get in the USA as a pistol, if not easier (state laws, age requirements for pistols). If mass shooters and murderers were really that attracted to them, they'd be used more frequently, but hardly any of the mass shootings have used them.

    I don't think we should follow the US in a lot of ways either.

    I also don't think that a person who can't be trusted to have a folding stock or bayonet lug (lol) on their gun should be trusted with ANY gun. If the E cat vetting process is supposed to keep those people out, why doesn't the A cat?? Where's the difference? I don't want someone who can't be trusted to have a flash hider (lol) to be able to have ANY gun.

  4. #4
    Member Littledog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    In the concrete jungle.
    Posts
    310
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    The USA is hard to use as an example as pistols are so easily obtained over there making firearms crime up but rifle specific crime lower. It's shown that the people that go on rampages either get or try to get Military styled weapons.

    To be honest I don't think the USA is any kind of example to follow, but it would be stupid not to observe and learn from any mistakes they have made.

    Enough from me.
    Rampages??? How many mass killing deaths in the USA within the last year? Sandyhook, Colarado! Add the deaths from these mass killings and others the last year and do we get 100 deaths-maybe? Then divide that by the population of the USA.

    Now what do we get. The number is so miniscal that are these AR15 killing machines really the killers we are lead to believe???

    Drink driving, stabbings, drug over dose, cycling etc etc. All individually would have a higher percentage of killings per capita in the USA than assault rifle type of thingies used in rampages.

    But cause they are black they must be bad (racist society maybe?)

    Its time society stopped believing what ever spin CNN and the movie makers put on the world and start to open there eyes. Any type of firearm in a responsible persons hands are NO threat at all. In the hands of a hater and nut job then yes a gun just as a car, knife, or pressure cooker can be used for harm.

    I wish the idiots in power will stop restricting my freedoms due to the actions of the nut jobs.

    Damn im more scared of idiot drivers in this country as they kill more people a year than MSSA rifles do!!!

    Cheers
    Lead delivery technician, Bulk orders welcome!!

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    128
    Quote Originally Posted by Littledog View Post
    I wish the idiots in power will stop restricting my freedoms due to the actions of the nut jobs.
    whats worse is they restricting our freedoms in reaction to nut jobs in a different country governed by completely different laws.

    I do agree with most ppl here, that the FAL should be harder to get, and if u are a 'fit and proper person' you should be for any type of firearm. with exception to pistols due to their concealability i guess.
    also think that firearm security should be steel container of stout construction minimum.

  6. #6
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Haydendev View Post
    also think that firearm security should be steel container of stout construction minimum.

    Yep.


    Pistols should be harder to get than a rifle, but you should be able to do more with them. I want to go handgun hunting with a S&W 629!!

  7. #7
    Member Savage1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    3,530
    Quote Originally Posted by Haydendev View Post
    whats worse is they restricting our freedoms in reaction to nut jobs in a different country governed by completely different laws.

    I do agree with most ppl here, that the FAL should be harder to get, and if u are a 'fit and proper person' you should be for any type of firearm. with exception to pistols due to their concealability i guess.
    also think that firearm security should be steel container of stout construction minimum.
    It was actually a nut job in our country that bought about the restrictions.

  8. #8
    By Popular Demand gimp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The Big H
    Posts
    9,890
    Quote Originally Posted by Savage1 View Post
    It was actually a nut job in our country that bought about the restrictions.
    Grey?

  9. #9
    Member Savage1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    3,530
    Yup, my history in this department isn't to great but I'm pretty sure the restrictions came about as a reaction to the Aramoana incident.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!