Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By Sideshow
  • 1 Post By nak
  • 1 Post By Yukon

Thread: Flir thermal

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606

    Flir thermal

    Does anyone have any experience with the flir ls 640. I believe the one I'm looking at is a 35mm

  2. #2
    Member Sideshow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,916
    Hey year I had a look through that and a pulsar model on a night vision night at a local gun shop.
    The Pulsar seemed better. Can't really give you more than that as once I looked through the two of them I lost interest in the Flir and just concentrated on the Pulsar.
    Yukon likes this.
    It's all fun and games till Darthvader comes along
    I respect your beliefs but don't impose them on me.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606
    What pulsar was that? Thermals have very confusing models and they seem to look the same externally..

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Marlborough - Pelorus Sound
    Posts
    5,455
    Quote Originally Posted by PerazziSC3 View Post
    What pulsar was that? Thermals have very confusing models and they seem to look the same externally..
    Nothing confusing Re Pulsar
    Just go on Google and study each model
    But rule of thumb you get what you pay for - as in - more you pay more you get

  5. #5
    nak
    nak is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    94
    I've used both pulsar (Helion and Trail) and FLIR LS units a fair bit. The FLIR units are more compact and seem more robust (but have yet to break a pulsar or a FLIR for that matter), but the image quality is far better on the Pulsar.
    Sideshow likes this.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606
    Quote Originally Posted by nak View Post
    I've used both pulsar (Helion and Trail) and FLIR LS units a fair bit. The FLIR units are more compact and seem more robust (but have yet to break a pulsar or a FLIR for that matter), but the image quality is far better on the Pulsar.
    Would you put the ls64 35mm flir on similiar standard to a hd38 quantum pulsar? Seem to have similiar specs

  7. #7
    nak
    nak is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Oz
    Posts
    94
    I haven't used the HD38's, but the trail xp series has a much better image than the FLIR LS both 640x480 (even though they should be similar).

    What are you looking at using it for?

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606
    Just a general spotter on big game to quickly scan over areas and highlight anything that needs closer inspection with binos. Its a bit of a novelty thing to be fair and budget only goes to 2k tops

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606
    Got the ls64. Its certainly on par with the 38hd I used a few years ago. Has a cool feature of showing red hot which stands out straight away for alive things...

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606
    And far more ergonomic

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Nationwide and South Pacific
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by PerazziSC3 View Post
    Got the ls64. Its certainly on par with the 38hd I used a few years ago. Has a cool feature of showing red hot which stands out straight away for alive things...
    That proves how good the old Pulsar HD38 is. The Flir LS64 has a 640 X 512 pixel sensor, whilst the Pulsar HD38 has a 384 x 288 pixel sensor, is 6 years old and pretty poor compared to the newer Pulsars, which have the 'red hot' mode plus loads of other features.
    PerazziSC3 likes this.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    4,606
    Yeah, this flir is 7 years old I believe

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Flir Scout TK
    By MB in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-06-2018, 11:07 AM
  2. Flir scout tk thermal monocular
    By matto1234 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-02-2017, 08:31 AM
  3. FLIR Scout TK for possums?
    By kiwichrish in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-11-2016, 08:45 PM
  4. FLIR Thermal Vision Gear
    By faregame in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: 07-05-2013, 02:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!