Thread: H & K sl8-6

Originally Posted by Bill999

then get a free ecat if it ever happens.

a few of those r15s on the predator forum over in the states shot superbly, and remington do make good barrels
there reputation isnt that great compared with the other manufacturers and there price is similar

I would have happily baught one when I first saw them, I ended up with a RRA which aparently is better. Its been years since iv seen a remmy so I cant really rember what they look like finish wise

I have had both a RRA and a colt sitting on my lap at the same time, both unfired.
I couldnt see what the extra 2000 for the colt got you. the rra looked just as good.

you dont need to have them side by side to a Norinco to see how crap they are. even the Nea falls short in this aspect, its just the finish the factory decides on.

You can't see it because it is in the material of the rifle. Colt uses high quality, true mil spec components and testing protocols in their rifles, RRA generally doesn't. I have both so I'm not biased either way.

its a matter of trying a whole bunch of them - and as long as you follow some guidelines/advice from people who have used them (a lot) like what is listed back in this post

Thats what I'm going to do, try, listen and choose something mid range that I can build on - at least get the base right

The overall answer is called BRD I think

consider 6.8 SPC more grunt than the pussy 223

Originally Posted by PTK

consider 6.8 SPC more grunt than the pussy 223

Also expensive ammo, harder to find parts/mags, whoops I fired 10 rounds and can only find 3 cases there goes $15