Thread: Has anybody else had accuracy problems with Sako 85 ?

Originally Posted by ChrisW

Just hang in there and we will get to the bottom of it. Either way when all is said and done you WILL have a rifle that shoots well

Good job Chris.

To answer your questions, firstly the other scope is a Weaver Grand Slam 3-10x40. These are parallax free at the range I was shooting...100 yds. This was mounted on Optiloks which would not work with the larger scope, hence the change in mount set up. The front rest is a Caldwell Rock rest with a bag at the rear.I am 61 and have been shooting since my army days in my early twenties. I have a .300 WM which I shoot sub moa. The Super Slam on the Sako came off an AR15 with a heavy barrel which I used to shoot sub moa groups and small animals ( possums at over 300 mtrs for example ).

Thanks again for your help.

Good outcome, Paul may I ask how many rounds you poked through from new?

So any updates ? Result ?

B

Originally Posted by shift14

So any updates ? Result ?

B

Yes - it was tested again with our optic setup and did not consider it to be as consistent as a Sako rifle should be.
Its been replaced with a brand new rifle.
Sako makes slick rifles. You WILL get what you pay for and you WILL be looked after in the event that it does not live up to expectations.

To the OP - enjoy your rifle and apologies for the frustrations.

Originally Posted by ChrisW

Yes - it was tested again with our optic setup and did not consider it to be as consistent as a Sako rifle should be.
Its been replaced with a brand new rifle.
Sako makes slick rifles. You WILL get what you pay for and you WILL be looked after in the event that it does not live up to expectations.

To the OP - enjoy your rifle and apologies for the frustrations.

It is a man made product

They aren't all perfect, whether it is a Lamborghini ,Schmidt Bender, Toyota or Swarovski makes little difference...shit happens from time to time

Originally Posted by ChrisW

Yes - it was tested again with our optic setup and did not consider it to be as consistent as a Sako rifle should be.
Its been replaced with a brand new rifle.
Sako makes slick rifles. You WILL get what you pay for and you WILL be looked after in the event that it does not live up to expectations.

To the OP - enjoy your rifle and apologies for the frustrations.

Do you guys want to be the agent for a few brands of hunting boots?

Originally Posted by ChrisW

Yes - it was tested again with our optic setup and did not consider it to be as consistent as a Sako rifle should be.
Its been replaced with a brand new rifle.
Sako makes slick rifles. You WILL get what you pay for and you WILL be looked after in the event that it does not live up to expectations.

To the OP - enjoy your rifle and apologies for the frustrations.

Good stuff there ChrisW.
Good to see Beretta doing a good job with customer satisfaction!

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

I’m curious to know how the rifle passed it’s testing at the factory?
Isn’t the whole point of the factory test to ensure that it’s shooting at moa?
I remember an old howa I had where the test target was included in the box, that was pretty reassuring.

Originally Posted by BruntyHunt

I’m curious to know how the rifle passed it’s testing at the factory?
Isn’t the whole point of the factory test to ensure that it’s shooting at moa?
I remember an old howa I had where the test target was included in the box, that was pretty reassuring.

Who knows, the tester must have held his tongue just right. It did shoot several groups under and inch but it also shot several over so the consistency just wasn’t as it should be.
The issue with including test targets is everyone then wants to cherry pick the ones that shot the tightest test group, when a single test group doesn’t mean all that much. You will end up with customers calling around all shops requesting pictures of test targets etc which will just create problems for everyone.

Yea that’s a fair as point about the targets Chris.
Btw my 6.5cm Finn II is a tack driver every time.

@ChrisW
This is an excellent result from a respected brand
Well done all.

@ChrisW from the way you have written this I assume that you are the shop owner.
I’d just like to congratulate you on some first class customer service. Maybe to you this is what it’s all about and comes naturally to you.
But it seems that it’s a dying art these days.....(either that our we just hear more about it)

Anyway good on you for coming on here and testing the rifle and scope and coming up with answers which seem to have ticked all the box’s!
If I was your customer I’d be very happy! I assume he is???

Some will understand that as a man made they are prone to being faulty as I posted before. Some won’t understand this.

PS I’d stay away from the boats they look like nothing but a headache

Originally Posted by Sideshow

@ChrisW from the way you have written this I assume that you are the shop owner....

Chris works for Beretta NZ, the importer and distributor for Sako and other top brands. Top bloke at getting things sorted.

Thanks for your help Chris, I picked up the replacement Thursday. Looking forward to the weather clearing so I can shoot it. Don't know if it's helpful, but I have noticed from the Sakos I have handled that the one that went back to you has a snugger fitting bolt...in fact one of my cheap trial factory bullets wouldn't chamber. I will update again once replacement is shot, btw GC have tested and they found it to be good ���� The biggest frustration I have had is that the process has seen me without a hunting rifle for six weeks after paying good money expecting a shooter out of the box. I understand that from time to time these things happen and I do appreciate that all the boxes have to be ticked in verification of a fault. Will the rifle go back to the factory for diagnosis ? I would be really interested in knowing what the fault is.