Thread: Here we go folks

Originally Posted by systolic

It's a good thing no-one jumped to conclusions and started firing off abusive or nose-out-of-joint emails before finding out exactly what was actually intended by this proposed amendment.

@systolic, do you believe the proposal as it is worded is

a) even remotely workable ?
b) well researched ?
c) something that the average law-abiding firearms owner would approve of ?
d) the level of quality in legal drafting we could expect from a member of parliament

Intent has nothing to do with it. What we have here is an embarrassingly poor proposal by an MP that reflects not only on himself, but also on his colleagues (do they just allow anyone to draft what they want without any quality control ?)