Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Darkness DPT


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 50
Like Tree94Likes

Thread: Hunting rifle

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    1,912
    Agreed Micky.. where do people get these ideas from?

    30 meters effective range for a 22LR? Good heavens no!

    Things a bit quieter for us in Canterbury last few years - biggest tally last year for an evening shoot plus couple morning hours was 403 rabbits. However prior to that for many years we were shooting by tens of thousands - over 1000 an evening at times. In heavy consistent shooting like this you put real pressure on the rifle makes, optics, ammo types, truck setups, night lights etc - and under max duress you learn what gear work best. Ours were all basic but extremely effective arms - Norinco, Savage, Marlin, CZ etc. Our average distance shot was 70m, our 22LRs all shot in for 75, and we would all expect to drop the bunnies at 100m. And did - by the thousands. Bench test the rifles well, tune them, precise ammo choice, then from bipod or truck 100m is no problem. No random opinion here - this is what we've done for years.

    And you do not need to go buying top end rifles, optics - at all. I've had getting on for 100 rifles/shotguns - some very expensive ones for competition and field use, many medium price makes, and many cheapies. They've all been thoroughly worked on range and in field. The fact is for standard barrel 22 or centrefire sporters that price is often an indicator of build quality, but is not necessarily of accuracy. Of huge number of 22s I benched, the most accurate were not expensive arms but rifles that cost me $2-300. That makes for precision field shooters. And with the centrefires the medium price rifles can be excellent off the bench and consistently lethal in the field. My present 223 for example is a Howa with a $300 Mueller scope on it. With factory Fiocchi ammo it shoots 0.4 - 0.8" groups on the bench, with a worst ever 5 shot group of 0.9". Worst! And it is absolutely deadly in the field.

    No problem to spend more on a name rifle. Can be fun - but is it necessary - no. The main hunting criteria is how effectively your rifle fulfills the field shooting task. Precision for the purpose.
    Last edited by mudgripz; 02-08-2023 at 05:04 PM.

  2. #2
    Member viper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Rabbitvegas
    Posts
    2,619
    Quote Originally Posted by mudgripz View Post
    Agreed Micky.. where do people get these ideas from?

    30 meters effective range for a 22LR? Good heavens no!

    Things a bit quieter for us in Canterbury last few years - biggest tally last year for an evening shoot plus couple morning hours was 403 rabbits. However prior to that for many years we were shooting by tens of thousands - over 1000 an evening at times. In heavy consistent shooting like this you put real pressure on the rifle makes, optics, ammo types, truck setups, night lights etc - and under max duress you learn what gear work best. Ours were all basic but extremely effective arms - Norinco, Savage, Marlin, CZ etc. Our average distance shot was 70m, our 22LRs all shot in for 75, and we would all expect to drop the bunnies at 100m. And did - by the thousands. Bench test the rifles well, tune them, precise ammo choice, then from bipod or truck 100m is no problem. No random opinion here - this is what we've done for years.

    And you do not need to go buying top end rifles, optics - at all. I've had getting on for 100 rifles/shotguns - some very expensive ones for competition and field use, many medium price makes, and many cheapies. They've all been thoroughly worked on range and in field. The fact is for standard barrel 22 or centrefire sporters that price is often an indicator of build quality, but is not necessarily of accuracy. Of huge number of 22s I benched, the most accurate were not expensive arms but rifles that cost me $2-300. That makes for precision field shooters. And with the centrefires the medium price rifles can be excellent off the bench and consistently lethal in the field. My present 223 for example is a Howa with a $300 Mueller scope on it. With factory Fiocchi ammo it shoots 0.4 - 0.8" groups on the bench, with a worst ever 5 shot group of 0.9". Worst! And it is absolutely deadly in the field.

    No problem to spend more on a name rifle. Can be fun - but is it necessary - no. The main hunting criteria is how effectively your rifle fulfills the field shooting task. Precision for the purpose.
    100% agree, 30 meters effective range !!!! , . With a half descent .22 you should be shooting 70 meters with ease . A bit of practice and getting to know your rifle / scope / ammo combo then 100 meters plus .
    mudgripz likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. My new hunting rifle
    By Treefeller in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 27-02-2019, 10:24 PM
  2. First hunting rifle
    By Shanes215 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: 19-10-2017, 11:31 PM
  3. Are you Looking to buy my first hunting rifle?
    By Shooter Digit in forum Shotgunning
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-08-2017, 05:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!