2.5-8
3-9
2-10
It is the glass manufacturer that makes the difference.
2.5-8
3-9
2-10
It is the glass manufacturer that makes the difference.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Fixed 4x on the 22
3-9x40 on my bush rifle
3-15x44 for open tops rifle
4-20x50 for long range varminting rifle.
Magnification can be good, but also work against you with the smaller field of view. As @jakewire said, I think glass quality is more important than magnification.
3-9 on .22
3-12 on .223
2.5-6 FFP on 243, bush gun
3-10 on 270.
3-9 with parallax sitting with night vision for .22 or .223.
3-15 new in box, don't know why I purchased it.
at it will be near enough to smack dead on at 26 yards too........
4x28
2.5-8x36
3-9x40
2-12x42
All leupys apart from a token zeiss. If I had a 7mmRM or similar I think I would want a 3.5-18. If I had a pure bush rifle I’d be keen to try a fixed 1.5x or a red dot
4-16 for my main hunting rifle but 90% of my hunting is open. Last deer I shot was at 16x and was about 80m away magnification seems to be my friend.
4-12 on my .223, and a fixed 8x Zeiss on my .30/06 tops rifle. I have a 2-7 on my .300 Blackout for bush work.
Most medium calibres zeroed at 200 will be plus or minus no more than 2" out to about 240 metres, 200 is my zero for the .30/06. To me bush shooting is below 100 metres so I like a 100 zero and just hold over for longer shots.
I always sighted my bush rifle which in those days was a 243 in at 50 yrds and from memory it was still a fraction high at 100 .
Whatever it was it worked well ( just had think that was over 20 years ago ) and accounted for many a Deer and Goat from zero to 150 yrds , most were 60 and in .
PS - A fixed 3 power Leupold was the optic of choice for that rifle.
FALL IN LOVE WITH THE NUMBERS , NOT THE IDEA
Bookmarks