A while back I was engaged in the ever popular debate over whether leaving a magazine loaded for extended periods of time would cause the spring to weaken when I remembered that I work at a company packed with materials science and physics PhDs. I put it to one of them for the final word. This is what I got in return...
Warning: This is not for the faint of heart.
****,
I’d be glad to, this sort of thing is fun (it’s the essence of engineering—to put a scientific explanation on a practical problem, right?): In my humble opinion, you will never see a misfeed occur due to a magazine spring being weakened from an extended period of time of being compressed. You’ll hear a lot of arguments that say things about creep, fatigue, relaxation etc, but I don’t believe any of them (it’s not like springs need a good night’s sleep and they’re back like new—that’s just wrong). Sure: if you leave your magazine in a 700F oven all the time, the metal is going to get softer, or leave it wet or drop it in saltwater and don’t clean it right away, then the spring is going to corrode and get weaker because there’s not as much metal in the spring any more. Maybe there’s something to the idea of a magazine that’s been sitting stationary for many years (not getting jostled around) where the rounds get bound up in some way and that leads to a misfeed—but that’s not due to the spring. The spring will be just as strong as on the day it was forged.
One reason I can think of for an aging or weakening effect would be due to creep or relaxation of the spring. Creep is when metal deforms over long periods of time when subjected to a sustained force that is much less than the yield strength of the material. The argument would be that a fully loaded magazine puts the spring under constant pressure and that the spring slowly deforms over time making it weaker. I argue that only an abused or poorly designed spring would do this. In the ‘70’s, houses were wired with aluminum wires because aluminum is cheaper than copper and is almost as conductive. The problem is that aluminum has a much lower melting point than copper and is more susceptible to creep. The problem with aluminum wire comes when you tighten down lug screws on terminal blocks: stress is applied to the aluminum and over decades, the wire deforms very slowly. Since screws don’t self-tighten it’s possible to get to the point where the connection gets loose and therefore is more electrically resistive, so when the circuit is under heavy load, the connection can get hot and can cause house fires. As a result aluminum wiring is now always landed with spring-loaded connectors that can’t get loose over time. So: creep is real and well understood. Does creep apply to springs? Yes, a spring will creep too, but who is going to make a spring out of un-alloyed, annealed aluminum? Spring steel is very strong and has a very high melting point. At room temperature, creep rates are negligible (see below).
You might also hear an argument that fatigue causes springs to get weaker (ie if you load/unload your magazine often it’s better/worse for the spring). Fatigue is cyclic stress loading (like the fuselage of an airplane that’s pressurized and depressurized every time it takes off and lands). Remember, fatigue is just a dynamic creep. It’s not like letting the material rest will heal it’s fatigue. Fatigue has more to do with stress concentrations (nicks/cracks) where damage is slowly propagated through the material. You might have heard about how southwest airlines grounded a bunch of their planes recently when they had one plane develop a huge crack in the fuselage mid-flight. This is a perfect example of a well-designed material. Airplane fuselages must be very fatigue resistant so that even if a crack forms it can grow feet in length and the plane still won’t catastrophically destruct (the airplane landed safely in the SWA case). Note that the military designs aircraft much less conservatively and has to use much more expensive x-ray crack detection technology because in fighters, millimeter long cracks will catastrophically destruct. I digress... As for magazine springs, fatigue is not really an issue unless the spring has been abused/damaged (think corrosion or nicks/cuts/scratches from a bad repair). Fatigue in a spring would lead to breakage, and not so much to weakening. So fatigue won’t soften springs either.
You wanted a technical explanation, here goes: unlike what you were probably taught in high school chemistry, metals are crystals where the constituent atoms are held together in a lattice, all separated from each other by a very specific distance. When you deform metals, defects called dislocations move through the crystal. A dislocation is a line of broken bonds in a crystal. As a dislocation moves, bonds break and reform. Multitudes (thousands or millions) of dislocations moving through a crystal allow the bulk metal to change shape without the whole crystal fracturing like glass (dislocations are a primary cause of the malleability of metal—glass doesn’t have dislocations). Dislocation mobility is proportional to temperature: at low temperatures metals are more likely to break than bend and at high temperatures, metals get very soft. This is due to vibrational energy of the lattice and the probability of the atoms to stray from their normal lattice spacing (ie the stretchability of the atomic bonds). If you’re designing a spring, the last thing you want it for your spring to deform (fail), so you want to use a high melting point material that’s more likely to break than bend at room temperature. As a result, creep for springs at room temperature is very low—much lower than that of soft or pure metals (eg aluminum wire). So: as long as you have a properly designed spring that hasn’t been stored in a hot oven and hasn’t been plastically deformed, chances are that your spring is as stiff is the day it was made. The question still remains though: if all metals creep (and springs do too), then how long before the spring in a fully loaded a magazine is significantly softer? For 316 stainless steel at high temperature (~550C) you can expect a 1% plastic deformation (1% is a commonly used failure criteria) from a reasonably medium-high constant stress (160MPa) after a little over a year (actually 10,000 hours). Since the creep is exponentially dependent on temperature through an Arrhenius relationship to activation energy of the creep mechanism, at room temperature you can expect this length of time to be a factor of about 10^18 longer (that’s about 3.7 million trillion years, I think). So, I think it’s safe to say that creep isn’t softening your magazine springs.
How’s that?
Thanks,
****
If you want to doubt that, go ahead. I think I'll take his word for it.
Bookmarks