Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

DPT Terminator


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 38
Like Tree71Likes

Thread: Legal length.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    South Canterbury
    Posts
    1,539

    Legal length.

    If a rifle is a tiny bit short to be legal length can a suppressor be permanently attached to make it long enough and if so how can suppressor be attached to make it legally fixed in position? ( Unremovable ) I assume loctite is not adequate.

  2. #2
    Gone but not forgotten
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Hamilton
    Posts
    4,129
    A thicker recoil pad would be easier
    dogmatix, rugerman, BSA and 5 others like this.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Bay of plenty
    Posts
    768
    Quote Originally Posted by RUMPY View Post
    If a rifle is a tiny bit short to be legal length can a suppressor be permanently attached to make it long enough and if so how can suppressor be attached to make it legally fixed in position? ( Unremovable ) I assume loctite is not adequate.
    It would need to be a fixed break pinned on at least so it’s not removable

  4. #4
    Member MCCPRO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2022
    Location
    Christchurch/Central Otago
    Posts
    338
    Ive heard differing interpretations on this. Ive had 2 rifles under 762(only just) and have just kept suppressors on them. I think it has to do with the intent of use "is not designed or adapted to be held and fired with 1 hand" thats section 50 of arms act but
    does still apply.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    218
    Quote Originally Posted by MCCPRO View Post
    Ive heard differing interpretations on this. Ive had 2 rifles under 762(only just) and have just kept suppressors on them. I think it has to do with the intent of use "is not designed or adapted to be held and fired with 1 hand" thats section 50 of arms act but
    does still apply.
    It's not really up for interpretation on legal length. The Arms Act states it pretty clearly. If they are under 762mm they are pistols. The key part below is "And includes any firearm"
    There is interpretation on how you fix this. From experience suppressors aren't really accepted anymore but this is fairly grey area.

    pistol means a firearm (other than a prohibited firearm or restricted weapon) that is designed or adapted to be held and fired with 1 hand, and includes any firearm (other than a prohibited firearm or restricted weapon) that is less than 762 millimetres in length

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    625
    Police policy is to measure to the rifling.
    Regards if the supressor is welded or pinned in needing a tool to remove for cleaning.

    Hence the p90 style bullpup stocks for 10/22 are no longer for sale. As they were sold with pinned suppressors to make longer than 762mm

    I know there was on going saga about this but not sure if it ever got any clarification.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Central Otago
    Posts
    2,278
    How are you measuring it? The correct method is to measure from the muzzle to the toe of the butt to achieve the greatest measurement. A bare 762mm is legal. Do not measure parallel to the bore as it will appear 8-10mm shorter. This is Court precedent as the 'length' of an item is the longest distance from one end point to the other, not from one end to a point in space. Imagine the length of a right-angled triangle. It is not the length from the furthest point to the 90 degree corner. It is the length of the hypotenuse.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    porirua
    Posts
    809
    Quote Originally Posted by gundoc View Post
    How are you measuring it? The correct method is to measure from the muzzle to the toe of the butt to achieve the greatest measurement. A bare 762mm is legal. Do not measure parallel to the bore as it will appear 8-10mm shorter. This is Court precedent as the 'length' of an item is the longest distance from one end point to the other, not from one end to a point in space. Imagine the length of a right-angled triangle. It is not the length from the furthest point to the 90 degree corner. It is the length of the hypotenuse.
    So its the fault of that greek barstard Pythagoras again fuck he caused some grief as an apprentice builder .

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by gundoc View Post
    How are you measuring it? The correct method is to measure from the muzzle to the toe of the butt to achieve the greatest measurement. A bare 762mm is legal. Do not measure parallel to the bore as it will appear 8-10mm shorter. This is Court precedent as the 'length' of an item is the longest distance from one end point to the other, not from one end to a point in space. Imagine the length of a right-angled triangle. It is not the length from the furthest point to the 90 degree corner. It is the length of the hypotenuse.
    I measured mine from the muzzle to the furthest point in a straight line. Not the Hypotenuse. So im safe.
    762 on the horizontal with toe 150mm below gives 777mm. 200mm toe below gives 789mm. I cold of chopped another ~14mm off my barrel if i really wanted haha.

  10. #10
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,070
    what have you purchased without consulting me?????
    best you bring it around so we can measure it up properly,I do happen to have a fat recoil pad sitting spare too.
    Nugget connaisseur likes this.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    South Canterbury
    Posts
    1,539
    I haven't bought anything just wanted to know if permanently attaching a suppressor to a short barrel makes it legal length.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    500
    I was about to ask, when do we get to see photos? But alas...
    bunji likes this.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    538
    I had to print a stock extension to get a 10/22 to legal length, it needed a touch over 30mm
    Name:  20220803_211204.jpg
Views: 801
Size:  3.84 MB
    Name:  20220726_212638.jpg
Views: 814
Size:  3.69 MB

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,350
    You should print one with the logo «* barely legal*» on it :-)
    makka likes this.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2021
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    459
    Quote Originally Posted by makka View Post
    I had to print a stock extension to get a 10/22 to legal length, it needed a touch over 30mm
    Attachment 216468
    Attachment 216469
    Great job, I have just got a printer I will have a play

    Cheers
    Darren
    Micky Duck and makka like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Would this be legal
    By Burb122 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-01-2020, 07:55 PM
  2. Minimum legal barrel length and overall length for firearms
    By A.J.P. in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 27-07-2015, 12:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!