Thread: Leupold VX 6 scopes

Is anyone currently using one of these? Ive just brought a rather classic looking rifle. Even though its capable of LR work I dont want it looking
like some of the rifles Ive had in the past.

Im thinking a 3x 18 x 44 with the CDS dial on top.Any feedback would be appreciated. Im not looking at any european scopes as I only want to dial MOA.
Nightforce are also out as the rifle is heavy enough without one of them on top

I have the same scope on my 7/375 its a mint scope, dials well and glass is great for what I need.
Just brought a Zeiss HD5 for a new build, will be interesting two compare them both.

Originally Posted by BRADS

I have the same scope on my 7/375 its a mint scope, dials well and glass is great for what I need.
Just brought a Zeiss HD5 for a new build, will be interesting two compare them both.

Thanks for that. Be interested to hear the comparisons .

What rifle did you get?

Originally Posted by Hendrik470

What rifle did you get?

Ring me when you get a minute. The bride doesnt know.

Ill let you know when mine turns up, its the 2-12 model tho

I've got the 3-18x44 illuminated boone crockett on a 7mm rem mag and love it!
Part of my reason for choosing this scope was to get a long range capable scope but without having massive turrent etc. Some scopes just look too big and bulky for when it comes to practical hunting.
Wide field of view, crisp image, side focus easy to use and very clear, yet to send away for the customs dials but will do so shortly, tracks well.
Initially I wasn't going to get the illuminated reticle but in the end I though bugger it, why not. I'm sure it will come in handy one day!??!

They are a great all round scope

Got the 3-18x44 illuminated boone and crockett on my 308. Haven't had it long (couple of weeks), but I love it so far!

Originally Posted by keen fella

I've got the 3-18x44 illuminated boone crockett on a 7mm rem mag and love it!
Part of my reason for choosing this scope was to get a long range capable scope but without having massive turrent etc. Some scopes just look too big and bulky for when it comes to practical hunting.
Wide field of view, crisp image, side focus easy to use and very clear, yet to send away for the customs dials but will do so shortly, tracks well.
Initially I wasn't going to get the illuminated reticle but in the end I though bugger it, why not. I'm sure it will come in handy one day!??!

Cheers mate. Exactly why I'm looking at it. Same calibre too

Has anyone ever actually needed a illuminated aim point?
I only ask cos i have never had a problem seeing my cross hair in any light. Only ever problem seeing target. This includes mornin evening and spotlighting even at extreme range just identifying yup deer or no cow sheep etc

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

Has anyone ever actually needed a illuminated aim point?
I only ask cos i have never had a problem seeing my cross hair in any light. Only ever problem seeing target. This includes mornin evening and spotlighting even at extreme range just identifying yup deer or no cow sheep etc

I had an illuminated nightforce npr2 reticle. I used it once in or twice at very last light.

I didnt want the extra weight, or the extra thing to go wrong and I think they are a bit of a gimmic

Yes have used an illuminated reticle at last light. On three occasions prior to getting one need it. Sambar at last light are very black and the cross hairs completely disappear on their body. It may be different with lighter coloured species of deer

I have a weaver 1.5-4.5 with illuminated scope, have found target acquisition with the dot great. Agree with Ackley, sometimes a crosshair on a black background hard to pick.


I hunt in the Bluies and wee black fallow in dim light with dark background...little red dot is all good.

If it fails scope works as normal, must admit mine is a pia with sometimes switching off due to contacts, lucky it has never been the difference between pulling the trigger or not.

My 2cents

Cheers

Dino