Thread: Is low to low?

Originally Posted by bigbear

This is why i went to a 44mm i always run the leupold neoprene covers also i thought it was going to be a tight fit and didn't want to buy then have to change rings

Yea know what you mean, tried the Leupold ones and they don't cover the windage and parallax turrets properly. I not fussed weather its 44 or 50, the 50 gives me more chance to see the target for a follow up. It's the reticle that sold it to me, this so far the best one yet for me.

Originally Posted by DBD

Yea know what you mean, tried the Leupold ones and they don't cover the windage and parallax turrets properly. I not fussed weather its 44 or 50, the 50 gives me more chance to see the target for a follow up. It's the reticle that sold it to me, this so far the best one yet for me.
Attachment 229530

Bigger objective lense doesn't neccessarily give bigger field of view, usually less. Have a look at scope and binocular specs to see what I mean.Generally to get bigger field of view in a bigger lense something else suffers unless you go for high end scopes then you tend to treat the unit like a pussy with flash scope covers etc.