Who here uses a 10x30 or 10x25 size bino and do you find them lacking much over a "full size" 10x42 bino? I'm thinking of replacing mine and could maybe save a few grams at the same time by going to a compact.
Who here uses a 10x30 or 10x25 size bino and do you find them lacking much over a "full size" 10x42 bino? I'm thinking of replacing mine and could maybe save a few grams at the same time by going to a compact.
I using 8x25 Swaro CL Mountains (latest Pockets)
They come in 10x too
Fantastic - fit into top shirt pocket - at daylight today I had a Thermal in right hand and them in left hand on neck strap and so easy
Watched 10 Deer too
Would have only seen prob 4 without Thermal as locator.
Just a head sticking up over Pine cutover stumps - then Bino
Have got Leica 10x25 Trinovid Pockets - not as good as the 8x Mountains
You get sick of them after a few hours glassing
Many reasons for eye strain with binoculars. One can be that the prisms are not correctly aligned so the two visual axes are not parallel. The bigger the magnification, the more that will be a problem. Even a fraction of a hairs breadth out may cause eye strain. With an expensive pair of binos, you'd have to ask, were they dropped real hard?
Other causes can be the binos are too heavy. Or too much magnification (shaky image and having to pan too much).
If the exit pupil is small, say in a pair of 10x25s with 2.5mm exit pupil, the binoculars are not so forgiving of eye positioning as some 7x35s which have twice as wide exit pupil (the width of the shaft of light coming out the eyepiece).
Don't do this for too long, but monocular telescopes have a use for that closer look, if you haven't got zoom telescopic sights for that use:
A short blurb on the use of telescopes in "upland deerstalking" from Why do upland deer stalkers seem to prefer telescopes? - Shooting UK
There’s a number of reasons the main one being that for any given magnification a telescope will be smaller and lighter than an equivalent set of binoculars.
Trying to assess a stag’s head from up to a mile away would require a colossal (and heavy) set of binos but an equivalent scope would be a quarter of the size and weight.
Furthermore a scope is much easier to hold steady in a prone position and for studying detail at long range there’s really no substitute.
The reason binoculars are so popular closer to sea level is because they have a wider field of view and are far easier to use from a standing or sitting position around fields and woods where ranges are shorter.
An itch ... is ... a desire to scratch
@Shearer seems to like his.
Personally, I couldn't bring myself to give away the extra FOV. Suspect you would lose a bit more than you think in low light, too.
Depending what country you in mostly
Open tops and Alp Thar hunting etc - no
Pulling out to scan a slip in Ruahine or Tararua type terrain - pockets perfect !!
I use the pockets more than the Alpha's but I ain't walking open Tussock/tops etc
Horses for courses
I have the swaro 10x25 pockets. They are great where weight and bulk are concerned. More scanning required due to field of view, but you can’t have everything.
What would you do about your bino harness then Ryan, and all your extras you stuff in it? Do AGC make a small harness for say the 10x30 CL Swaro's?
Bookmarks