Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35
Like Tree57Likes

Thread: MRAD vs MOA: Which Do You Prefer for Hunting? Considering Zeiss Conquest V6 Purchase

  1. #1
    Member TakaRat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2024
    Location
    JAFA Land
    Posts
    58

    Question MRAD vs MOA: Which Do You Prefer for Hunting? Considering Zeiss Conquest V6 Purchase

    Hey everyone,

    I've been diving deep into the world of hunting optics, and I'm currently at a crossroads. I wanted to get your thoughts on the whole MRAD vs MOA debate. Which system do you prefer for hunting, and why? Do you find one easier to use or more precise than the other?

    I'm particularly interested because I'm looking at buying a Zeiss Conquest V6 scope. It looks like an excellent piece of equipment, but it's only offered in MOA. I've noticed that many hunters start with MOA and then transition to MRAD as they gain more experience.

    Has anyone here made that switch? If so, what prompted you to move from MOA to MRAD? Any advice for someone considering the Zeiss Conquest V6 but also thinking about the future possibility of switching to MRAD?

  2. #2
    Gkp
    Gkp is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Queenstown
    Posts
    1,923
    Meters or yards?
    Providing your range finder can do either then it's just a matter of changing the units on your ballistic app.
    I guess the only change which may take getting use to is wind calls. Mph to kph. I guess you could carry a cheat sheet. I'm just a hunter so if it's too windy I get closer or don't take the shot.
    If the reticle on that scope suits you just stick to moa. The target won't know the difference
    Dazzh and TakaRat like this.

  3. #3
    Caretaker
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,298
    MOA
    TakaRat likes this.
    A big fast bullet beats a little fast bullet every time

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    1,186
    Use what the people youn hunt with use, same as yards vs meters.

    If you hunt by yourself, use the one that makes sense to you. I went mil first and have gone to moa because that's what my mates use.
    TakaRat likes this.

  5. #5
    Member andyanimal31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Makakahi road Raetihi
    Posts
    3,710
    Quote Originally Posted by 7mmsaum View Post
    MOA
    Grow up Andrew!

    Sent from my SM-A556E using Tapatalk
    7mmsaum, Savage1 and BRADS like this.
    My favorite sentences i like to hear are - I suppose so. and Send It!

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South taranaki
    Posts
    432
    Just pick one and run with it.
    For hunting it doesn't matter.
    Don't get caught up with mils is metric and moa is imperial cause that's bullshit.

    If that's the scope you want then just buy it.
    I run both mil and moa scopes, your ballistic calculator gives

    both mil and moa out puts for meter or yard inputs.
    Using Tapatalk

  7. #7
    LOVE RED MIST deye223's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Aussie vic
    Posts
    223
    MOA for years and to old and grumpy to change I dial so laser dial and shoot
    TakaRat likes this.

  8. #8
    LBD
    LBD is offline
    Member LBD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Murchison
    Posts
    811
    mils..... was moa

    And I am probably older and grumpier than deye223
    TakaRat likes this.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Middle Earth
    Posts
    4,350
    If shooting nra targets, get moa.
    If shooting tiny targets at long distances and need the finest adjustments , get 1/4 or even 1/8th moa scope depending on the game
    You play.
    Anything else mrad or moa works about the same
    TakaRat likes this.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,233
    Quote Originally Posted by lau lau View Post
    Just pick one and run with it.
    For hunting it doesn't matter.
    Don't get caught up with mils is metric and moa is imperial cause that's bullshit.

    If that's the scope you want then just buy it.
    I run both mil and moa scopes, your ballistic calculator gives

    both mil and moa out puts for meter or yard inputs.
    This.

    Both are units of angular measurement (think a quarter of a clock face).

    Best check what your scope actually dials out to via tall target. Some scopes won't even give a consistent click value!

    Another thing to consider is your scope being made in increments of 1/4, half or 1 MOA per click. Almost all scopes in Mil are 0.1 although S&B made 0.05 mil clicks for a while.

    One last thing, there is 'shooters MOA' (1 inch per 100 yards, not true MOA!), artillery Mils, NATO Mils, Warsaw Pact Mils...
    TakaRat likes this.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,233
    Quote Originally Posted by Friwi View Post
    If shooting nra targets, get moa.
    If shooting tiny targets at long distances and need the finest adjustments , get 1/4 or even 1/8th moa scope depending on the game
    You play.
    Anything else mrad or moa works about the same
    Unless F-Class, ammunition/rifle/shooter dispersion will mean your 1/8 MOA click gets lost in the 'noise' of the system.

    Most reliable method is holding off via appropriately segmented reticle (not a duplex)...!
    TakaRat likes this.

  12. #12
    STC
    STC is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Location
    South
    Posts
    687
    most common moa scopes are 1/4 moa adjustment which is finer than the most common mrad scope adjustments (which are 1/10 MRAD afaik?

    both are measures of angle and have nothing to do with yards meters or any other appropriate (or inappropriate) measure of length.
    TakaRat likes this.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Okawa Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    3,103
    Greetings,
    I really fail to understand why anybody is still working in the obsolete units almost 50 years after NZ changed to metric. Milliradians are not a metric unit exclusively but work better in base 10 measuring systems. That said I still weigh powder in grains for simplicity and my chronograph still reads in fps due to me being too lazy to change it. but all other measuring is in metric. Mils are a smaller unit than milliradians (mrad) due to use by the military but I believe that Leupold scopes at least are calibrated in mrad. Working as a draughtsman I worked in metric from the early 1970's so made the change to metric earlier than some. Metres and mrad for me.
    Regards Grandpamac.
    308, HuntBeta and TakaRat like this.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,233
    Name:  Screenshot_20240620_210545_Facebook.jpg
Views: 329
Size:  908.6 KB
    Trout, STC and TakaRat like this.

  15. #15
    Member chainsaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Norf
    Posts
    5,808
    Moa
    TakaRat likes this.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!