Thread: New Hardy suppressors

I would have thaught DPT would have taken lightest, and if you remove a baffle or so it becomes less than 80mm forward

Ill let you know when it turns up

Originally Posted by Bill999

I would have thaught DPT would have taken lightest, and if you remove a baffle or so it becomes less than 80mm forward

Ill let you know when it turns up

But removing it decreases performance it can't not like the atec etc everything has compromise, it's only my opinion but hardy covers them all well to suit all range of people and tested to with stand more then rated for so light for hunting and solid for range work with out adding or removing baffles less things for average goe to play with an go wrong with same poi not having to resite for more or less baffles.

Have talked to Dan about his testing here's what he said quoting testing. . ..

"Our Db testing for our standard size can is done on a Remington 308.

Destructive testing for standard suppressor is done on a 16” barrelled 300 wsm – 100 rounds with no signs of stretching of deformation. We get the ammo loaded by the guys at dead eye dicks so they can attest to the strength of the suppressors.

Proof testing in the UK for standard 308 suppressor is done with a 300 win mag with 25% over max loads.

*

The London proof master is ex EME Army Armourer same as our crew so it’s really cool talking to him about how he proofs our gear.

They don’t even bother trying to abuse the magnum suppressors"

*
This is a bread winner right there. . . . .


Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk 2