Desperately after a new set of binos. What would you guys recommend? looking at the vortex vipers/Nikon monarchs price range or do I go something like the Diamondbacks and save for a set of swaros/Leica down the track?
Thanks in advance
Printable View
Desperately after a new set of binos. What would you guys recommend? looking at the vortex vipers/Nikon monarchs price range or do I go something like the Diamondbacks and save for a set of swaros/Leica down the track?
Thanks in advance
buy once, cry once is my only advice.
I just bought some stieners about 245.00 from top gear really nice also small and light
Went with leupolds and fairly happy, might lose thelast 10Min of light vs lots more money
Someone was asking about the Sightron SII? I think not long ago.
I tried some Leupold, Nikon Monarch and Steiner last month. Not really impressed with any of them for their money considering they were all $800+
But that's just my eyes so try some out before you buy.
Yeah, this one.
http://www.nzhuntingandshooting.co.n...oculars-27037/
Vortex Diamondback 10x42 good value for money. I bought a set for my son so he kept his mitts off my Swaro's, pleasantly surprised about the quality. Others will back me up on that :ORLY:
I was using my Geovids in the weekend, with thick cloud cover and a half moon I could still see deer at 200m and at 560m (range finder works well at night) I could count individual sheep. For comparison my Zeiss Conquest scope couldnt see shit at 50m.
Edit: for clarity, this was at 8pm
it wasn't a comparison to a scope. it was a comparison to his luoplds losing the last 10 mins of light...
How would that affect light transmission though? I would think the magnification and number of lenses/surfaces the light passes through is the main factor.
Irrelevant as it will gain that in the distance from the quarry to the objective. What would matter more is the distance through glass and with most binos being fixed magnification that may be less than a variable power scope. Conversely with the shorter length with the binos the lenses will need to be thicker in order to bend the light more and it also has to go through a prism. I think the fact that both eyes are receiving light from the binos and that your brain can do some amazing processing to overlay the images would produce the different result.
You could all be right, I simply made it up as I went :) Makes sense to me though and that's what matters aye :D Less distance for light to travel to eye? Until I'm proven otherwise i'll stick to it ;)
OK upon researching I believe I was wrong........seems due to using two eyes you will almost always see better than one :D Gadget you are the boss!!
So you need two eyes to get the benefit... I guess there is no point in chiefs supporters having binos then?