Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Gunworks Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 57
Like Tree36Likes

Thread: Oceania defense suppressors

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    2,406

    Oceania defense suppressors

    Hey team. I was at the Sika Show and saw these suppressors up close at the Glacier Rifle Stand. I had a chat to Jed who from my understanding is one of the engineers at GRC. I think they supply certain parts for the OD suppressor.

    I was very impressed with his rundown on the suppressor however I don't seem to hear much about them. Not many threads about them either.

    Does anyone run these on a magnum? I'm looking at one for a 20" 6.5prc. Just looking for pros and cons. (One con obviously being the cost)

    https://gunsnz.com/Oceania-Defense-S...roduct_id=5405

    Name:  Screenshot_20221115_150343.jpg
Views: 1141
Size:  1.07 MB

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    Yeah there are threads on here, in my opinion best suppressor you can buy in NZ, overseas people are very impressed as a number of foreign Special Forces have trialed them.

    Only thing is they are a bit more expensive than other NZ made ones but on a par or cheaper than overseas top of the line ones.

    Why I like them is they give your rifle back it's balance for freehand shooting.

    I just run an m14 Thread Oceania Alpine 30 cal on 270, run my old black rifle 556 Samson on my 22.250. Also have a 30 cal rachet/brake one that can quickly pop on my 22 Creedmore, 6.5 Creedmore or 308.Also have a 9mm pistol one use on a glock.

    Cracks me up, my 22.250 Ruger cost 700 bucks with a set of dies, sports a 9 hundy suppressor, 3-15 Vx5 and javelin bipod, great wee rifle though!

    270 is using about 57 grains of Super-performance powder with the Alpine model, I reckon you would get away with it on 6.5 PRC if you want super-light and compact? If you want greater noise reduction could go up to a magnum, bit more expensive.
    Last edited by jackson21; 15-11-2022 at 04:07 PM.
    hotsoup likes this.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    2,406
    Quote Originally Posted by jackson21 View Post
    270 is using about 57 grains of Super-performance powder with the Alpine model, I reckon you would get away with it on 6.5 PRC if you want super-light and compact? If you want greater noise reduction could go up to a magnum, bit more expensive.
    I'm wanting my 6.5 as light as possible yep. I'm not shooting often, I'd be lucky to take 1 shot on a trip. I was hoping to run a non magnum but thought there may be some issues with that? What issues could arise if I ran a non magnum version? @jackson21

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    Quote Originally Posted by hotsoup View Post
    I'm wanting my 6.5 as light as possible yep. I'm not shooting often, I'd be lucky to take 1 shot on a trip. I was hoping to run a non magnum but thought there may be some issues with that? What issues could arise if I ran a non magnum version? @jackson21
    Maybe give them a call? But my thoughts are whilst it's called a magnum if you can run cartridges with simular powder weight I wouldn't think it's an issue as surely it's same pressures etc?

    I was bit nervous running my 22.250 through my 556 one but seems fine, probably put 600 rounds of 22.250 through it, probably 2500 rounds of 5.56 before that.
    hotsoup likes this.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    2,406
    Quote Originally Posted by jackson21 View Post
    Maybe give them a call? But my thoughts are whilst it's called a magnum if you can run cartridges with simular powder weight I wouldn't think it's an issue as surely it's same pressures etc?

    I was bit nervous running my 22.250 through my 556 one but seems fine, probably put 600 rounds of 22.250 through it, probably 2500 rounds of 5.56 before that.
    Will do. I've tried calling a couple of times but haven't got through. Makes sense though, cheers for feedback

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    Quote Originally Posted by hotsoup View Post
    Will do. I've tried calling a couple of times but haven't got through. Makes sense though, cheers for feedback
    I would, but I don't want to be giving you advice above my pay grade. I was going to run it on my 6.5 x 284 which is simular to a prc but decided to just leave as was with longer barrel un-suppressed.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    Quote Originally Posted by hotsoup View Post
    I'm wanting my 6.5 as light as possible yep. I'm not shooting often, I'd be lucky to take 1 shot on a trip. I was hoping to run a non magnum but thought there may be some issues with that? What issues could arise if I ran a non magnum version? @jackson21
    I think when they mean Magnum it's like 7mm, 300 WinMag with large case capacity, and then they do a 338 Lap as well.
    hotsoup likes this.

  8. #8
    Member Rich007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Levin, Horowhenua
    Posts
    1,066
    I have an oceania defence alpine on my 30/06. I really rate it
    jackson21 and hotsoup like this.
    If my work annoys me, I cull them

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Kapiti
    Posts
    363
    Best suppressor money can buy
    jackson21 and hotsoup like this.

  10. #10
    308
    308 is offline
    Member 308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Wairarapa
    Posts
    4,154
    good units, recommend

    Lighter is better

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Wanganui
    Posts
    3,442
    Their muzzle foward right?

  12. #12
    Member Tommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    W-BOP
    Posts
    6,575
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelton View Post
    Their muzzle foward right?
    Not all of them.
    Identify your target beyond all doubt

  13. #13
    Member Wingman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    2,005
    Quote Originally Posted by Tommy View Post
    Not all of them.
    They are now.. all the new ones are muzzle forward.
    I cant keep up with them.. they seem to constantly be changing them and developing something "better".
    Personally I'm not a fan. They are 3-4 times the price of a good alloy over barrel, they are no quieter than any other suppressor and IMO (and Hardy's) the DPT and Hardy are quieter. They are not actually that light, titanium is a heavier material than the alloy used by dpt and Hardy and if all things were equal wit the Oceania muzzle cans eg diameter and length/internal volume etc they would actually be much heavier.
    They are strong where it counts and can cope with sustained full auto for which is why they have been tested by over seas defence agencies but that is of no use to us.
    The reason they dont make a larger over barrel unit is mostly because of the cost of printing it.
    While the tech is cool I'm not a fan of the gritty finish and the odd looking raised twist patern on the outside of the can. It just looks wrong.
    The price tag doesnt reflect a 3x better suppressor than others so I for one will continue to use DPTs and Hardies.
    Micky Duck likes this.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    984
    Quote Originally Posted by Wingman View Post
    They are now.. all the new ones are muzzle forward.
    I cant keep up with them.. they seem to constantly be changing them and developing something "better".
    Personally I'm not a fan. They are 3-4 times the price of a good alloy over barrel, they are no quieter than any other suppressor and IMO (and Hardy's) the DPT and Hardy are quieter. They are not actually that light, titanium is a heavier material than the alloy used by dpt and Hardy and if all things were equal wit the Oceania muzzle cans eg diameter and length/internal volume etc they would actually be much heavier.
    They are strong where it counts and can cope with sustained full auto for which is why they have been tested by over seas defence agencies but that is of no use to us.
    The reason they dont make a larger over barrel unit is mostly because of the cost of printing it.
    While the tech is cool I'm not a fan of the gritty finish and the odd looking raised twist patern on the outside of the can. It just looks wrong.
    The price tag doesnt reflect a 3x better suppressor than others so I for one will continue to use DPTs and Hardies.
    When I bought mine they were not even twice what a Hardy was, actually my first one was only a couple of hundred dollars more than a Hardy at the time as someone had used it as a demo.

    Maybe they have gone up in price and Hardies down? I'm guessing you probably shoot from a bipod? If your are trying to shoot unsupported that extra weight saving not on end of barrel I find a massive difference to being able to hold steady.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hastings
    Posts
    2,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Wingman View Post
    They are now.. all the new ones are muzzle forward.
    I cant keep up with them.. they seem to constantly be changing them and developing something "better".
    Personally I'm not a fan. They are 3-4 times the price of a good alloy over barrel, they are no quieter than any other suppressor and IMO (and Hardy's) the DPT and Hardy are quieter. They are not actually that light, titanium is a heavier material than the alloy used by dpt and Hardy and if all things were equal wit the Oceania muzzle cans eg diameter and length/internal volume etc they would actually be much heavier.
    They are strong where it counts and can cope with sustained full auto for which is why they have been tested by over seas defence agencies but that is of no use to us.
    The reason they dont make a larger over barrel unit is mostly because of the cost of printing it.
    While the tech is cool I'm not a fan of the gritty finish and the odd looking raised twist patern on the outside of the can. It just looks wrong.
    The price tag doesnt reflect a 3x better suppressor than others so I for one will continue to use DPTs and Hardies.
    We swear our MKll 243 magnum is quieter than our MK1 223 with 7 baffles. Plus o/b. Whats not to like. New DPT MKll. LOL.
    Micky Duck likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Whats happening with Oceania Defense
    By Staffnurse41 in forum Gear and Equipment
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-12-2021, 01:20 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!