Thread: Poachers life

Originally Posted by SlimySquirrel

The owner of the vehicle has been in touch.
Claims that he only had a .22 in the car..... plenty of evidence at the moment and there was more than one person in the car so it will be a race to see who rats on who as no one will want the blame for this.

I have a QC looking into it. The same QC who prosecuted a poaching ring so they know their stuff and there are multiple charges that will be laid on top of the poaching charge.

Well that’s nice he’s been in touch and admitted that he was there.

Regardless of the rifle being a .22 or .308 he had no legal right to be shooting from his vehicle on a public road!

He also had no authority to be shooting into someone’s private property regardless of the animal that was shot without permission.

Sounds to me like the guy has made contact in order to do some damage control and avoid the courts!