I'm drawn to the mountains and the bush, it's where life is clear, where the world makes the most sense.
Thats crap oi......
I disagree,
". To deliver on the intent of the Act Police needs to consider whether the application relates to a part of a MSSA or part of an A category firearm. Where it is possible that the part could be either for an A category or an E category firearm Police is required to seek further clarification about the intended use of the part." As I read that, and also confirmed by AO all they want to do is make sure that incoming parts are for acat rifles.. it's not much extra effort, yes it's a bit annoying but all the fuss is over a little bit of paper that takes 5 minutes to fill out..
Impossible is the correct word. Unless it's a magazine of more than 7 rounds (which can be used on some a cat rifles), a pistol grip, gas block with baynet lug or so called flash hider. These parts can also be modified to make them a-cat and then fitted a-cat.Originally Posted by Gloves;729195 As I read that, and also confirmed by AO all they want to do is make sure that incoming parts are for a-cat rifles.. it's almost [U
Its silly because in reality all of it's about how the AR looks, nothing about function. You can only really argue that one about magazines.
The big giveaway here is the inclusion of the word "intent". The Police are using this to enforce arbitrary restrictions on AR (and maybe AK) components by coming up with their own interpretations of the act. If this was in fact what the act required, any component for any semi auto would need a permit (off the top of my head I cant think of a single semi that could not be made in MSSA configuration). Using their logic you need an import permit to bring in a set of $2 aliexpress scope rings because they could be fitted to an AR....
Essentially they are saying, this is what the law says, but, yea na it actually means this.
Bookmarks