Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
Like Tree10Likes

Thread: Pump Action AR-10 Made in Australia

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    145

    Pump Action AR-10 Made in Australia

    This is the Wedgetail Industries MPR308.
    It is a pump action version AR-10 variant made in Victoria.
    It has a 16" threaded barrel and takes SR25 magazines.

    https://wedgetailindustries.com/prod...-action-rifle/
    https://shootersdelight.com.au/produ...-action-rifle/

    I think the photos speak for themselves:
    Attached Images Attached Images       
    "An experienced shooter of limited skill and dangerous enthusiasm." -Hitman: Blood Money newspaper

  2. #2
    Member Sasquatch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    The Forest
    Posts
    3,036
    Yes please.

  3. #3
    Member Max Headroom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    4,124
    Quote Originally Posted by Sasquatch View Post
    Yes please.
    amen.
    RIP Harry F. 29/04/20

  4. #4
    Member Cordite's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    NZ Mainland (Dunedin)
    Posts
    5,538
    Why did they retain the (now useless) buffer spring tube? Prevents the rifle from having a (really useful) folding stock.

    Could be improved further by a straight pull ambidextrous cocking handle for when you're prone and can't use the pump action so well.

    I know.... (-:

    Name:  72110d1437308363-french-car-owners-monthly-tyre-kicking-day-dsc02513.jpg
Views: 3677
Size:  99.9 KB

  5. #5
    Member canross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Chch
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordite View Post
    Why did they retain the (now useless) buffer spring tube? Prevents the rifle from having a (really useful) folding stock.

    Could be improved further by a straight pull ambidextrous cocking handle for when you're prone and can't use the pump action so well.

    I know.... (-:

    Attachment 118788
    My guess would be price point - change as much as is needed so the bureaucrats don't have an excuse to ban it, then use as many off the shelf components as you can get to keep your costs down. That said I agree, a folding stock would be the way to go unless that's a no-no in Aus?



    Ultimately where there's a will there's a way. If it comes out cheaper than the PAR there's a market for them here.... or maybe an in-country manufacturer will be able to start up? I'd imagine that there must be a group of knowledgeable and experienced people who have both the legal and financial means to make it happen if the market is there.
    Last edited by canross; 31-08-2019 at 10:35 AM.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by Cordite View Post
    Why did they retain the (now useless) buffer spring tube? Prevents the rifle from having a (really useful) folding stock.

    Could be improved further by a straight pull ambidextrous cocking handle for when you're prone and can't use the pump action so well.

    I know.... (-:
    I think these PAR type rifles will be easier to shoot prone if there is a small cylinder or even something like part of a Mapgul hand stop kit on the side picatinny portion so you grip and cycle it on the side. The only thing better than that would be a proper side charger linked to a pump action which is what I think you are suggesting. Gun Supplies may come out with something but I just can't see their milspec lowers being allowed to be used.

  7. #7
    ebf
    ebf is offline
    Mushroom juice ! Hic ! ebf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Above the Hutt
    Posts
    6,872
    Looking at the components, there is very little commonality between that and a real AR platform...

    Barrel looks the same, bolt head looks like AR, but different bolt body. Looks like proprietary upper and lower...
    Viva la Howa ! R.I.P. Toby | Black rifles matter... | #illegitimate_ute

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by ebf View Post
    Looking at the components, there is very little commonality between that and a real AR platform...

    Barrel looks the same, bolt head looks like AR, but different bolt body. Looks like proprietary upper and lower...
    Yep. Apart from the dust cover it is very similar to the Troy PAR .308, the one at the top is a PAR isn't it? . The rail on the bottom pics has no cut outs so it is going to be pretty hefty and it has only a small strip of pic rail on the top.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Oamaru
    Posts
    4,362
    How much?
    How long?

    Surely we make a better one?



    Sent from my CPH1701 using Tapatalk

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Waiuku
    Posts
    848
    I wonder what the weight difference is between the Remington and the AR pump.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by Got-ya View Post
    I wonder what the weight difference is between the Remington and the AR pump.
    From everything I've read the PAR is built more sturdy.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by 308mate View Post
    From everything I've read the PAR is built more sturdy.
    Burley Arms had to have improved slide release buttons made up for the PAR because the factory ones kept breaking.
    Overall I'm not that impressed by that rifle, and Troy Industries has some pretty anti-gun business practices as well.
    I wouldn't buy any of their products for that reason alone.

    The Remington 7600 and 7615, on the other hand, are largely based on the Remington 870 and have a long and proven track record.
    They have even seen some law enforcement use, and reports about them are generally very good.
    If I had to choose one to trust my life to(regardless of my opinion of the manufacturers), it would be the Remington every time.
    I have stripped many 870s down completely and have always been impressed by the quality of design, engineering, and materials.
    "An experienced shooter of limited skill and dangerous enthusiasm." -Hitman: Blood Money newspaper

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    313
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwigunguy View Post
    Burley Arms had to have improved slide release buttons made up for the PAR because the factory ones kept breaking.
    Overall I'm not that impressed by that rifle, and Troy Industries has some pretty anti-gun business practices as well.
    I wouldn't buy any of their products for that reason alone.

    The Remington 7600 and 7615, on the other hand, are largely based on the Remington 870 and have a long and proven track record.
    They have even seen some law enforcement use, and reports about them are generally very good.
    If I had to choose one to trust my life to(regardless of my opinion of the manufacturers), it would be the Remington every time.
    I have stripped many 870s down completely and have always been impressed by the quality of design, engineering, and materials.
    Remington 7615 isn’t looked cool

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by Kiwigunguy View Post
    Burley Arms had to have improved slide release buttons made up for the PAR because the factory ones kept breaking.
    Overall I'm not that impressed by that rifle, and Troy Industries has some pretty anti-gun business practices as well.
    I wouldn't buy any of their products for that reason alone.

    The Remington 7600 and 7615, on the other hand, are largely based on the Remington 870 and have a long and proven track record.
    They have even seen some law enforcement use, and reports about them are generally very good.
    If I had to choose one to trust my life to(regardless of my opinion of the manufacturers), it would be the Remington every time.
    I have stripped many 870s down completely and have always been impressed by the quality of design, engineering, and materials.
    Yeah the second gen PAR has an improved release button and a better foregrip. I have an 870 Wingmaster, beautiful action. The 7615 did not feel a patch on the 870 to me but that's just my opinion.

    Troy as a company has a bad rep but I haven't read many bad things about the Troy PAR itself other than the button issue on the first gen ones. It is a billet upper and lower and has a very smooth action, check out the nutnfancy and Iraqveteran8888 reviews on YouTube.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Otago
    Posts
    190
    The PAR is the same but cheaper. The sad part is now kiwis are regulated at wishing they could own ozzie guns!

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Old Pump action .22
    By specweapon in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-03-2016, 04:40 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!