Thread: Richard Lincoln

Again.. you don't know anything about this other that relying on stuff articles. And they are just such a reliable source.

By the way - never have I known that the use of the law to extract a pound of flesh was not lawful. Its certainly not grounds for denying the progress of a private prosecution. In fact it is a constant dirge from the victims of any crime that their sense of justice must be met. To deny that when the alleged offender is a policeman is plainly a double standard.

And the descriptor used for that particular police officer is polite frankly.. if you want to bother finding out what what the judge said about the activites of the police and how they handled Lincoln... go and read the original case.

The cause of that situation was in the response to it. The author of that was well described.

Originally Posted by Sidney

Again.. you don't know anything about this other that relying on stuff articles. And they are just such a reliable source.

By the way - never have I known that the use of the law to extract a pound of flesh was not lawful. Its certainly not grounds for denying the progress of a private prosecution. In fact it is a constant dirge from the victims of any crime that their sense of justice must be met. To deny that when the alleged offender is a policeman is plainly a double standard.

And the descriptor used for that particular police officer is polite frankly.. if you want to bother finding out what what the judge said about the activites of the police and how they handled Lincoln... go and read the original case.

The cause of that situation was in the response to it. The author of that was well described.

This is indeed dire, Sidney. I read your two posts above knowing that you usually tend to defend our legal system.