Thread: Richard Lincoln

Originally Posted by gundoc

You frequently hear the word 'represent' used by various (and frequently limp-wristed, left-wing, 'academic') groups who claim to be acting in the 'public interest', which, of course is nonsense because they never asked anyone outside their small clique of sycophants.

So basically you are saying that the NSA is a limp-wristed, left-wing, academic group ?

Coz acting on behalf of others, for their supposed benefit (even if they don't want you to, because you claim to know what is better for them) is exactly what the NSA does

Originally Posted by ebf

So basically you are saying that the NSA is a limp-wristed, left-wing, academic group ?

Coz acting on behalf of others, for their supposed benefit (even if they don't want you to, because you claim to know what is better for them) is exactly what the NSA does

I realise that you come from a country where English is a second language, but you have, yet again, put an incorrect meaning on plain English words. Richard Lincoln never said he was 'representing' anyone, and neither did I. What I said, in essence, was that the NSA took action in instances where the Police had been making decisions that were outside their legal powers (ie: ultra vires) in relation to the administration of the Arms Act. There was never any claim to be 'representing' anyone, but rather instituting action to ensure that the rule of law is followed and we do not become a Police State. The decisions are in the interests of all firearms owners, but no claim is made to be 'representing' them. I am sure that no-one is of the opinion that the NSA is 'limp-wristed', 'left wing', or 'academic'!