Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 136
Like Tree457Likes

Thread: Rifle and Optics Snobs

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    There seems to be a trend these days with many new hunters who think they,re going to shoot deer at say 600 meters with their .308 or similar powered cartridge and subsequently mount some huge Hubble type scope on it. Of course, the rifle is completely unbalanced and a liability to carry around. This big zoom scope idea is pushed by many retail sales personnel because big zoom scopes cost a lot more than a simple lightweight smaller fixed or lower magnification zoom scope. Long distance shooting is a skill that has to be mastered. Most newbies from.what I've seen, have no idea how far 600 meters actually is but they have convinced themselves that they are real hunters now and want other hunters to think they are hot shots. I suppose that could be a form of snobbery.

  2. #2
    MB
    MB is offline
    Member MB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Deerless North
    Posts
    4,950
    Quote Originally Posted by 10-Ring View Post
    There seems to be a trend these days with many new hunters who think they,re going to shoot deer at say 600 meters with their .308 or similar powered cartridge and subsequently mount some huge Hubble type scope on it. Of course, the rifle is completely unbalanced and a liability to carry around. This big zoom scope idea is pushed by many retail sales personnel because big zoom scopes cost a lot more than a simple lightweight smaller fixed or lower magnification zoom scope. Long distance shooting is a skill that has to be mastered. Most newbies from.what I've seen, have no idea how far 600 meters actually is but they have convinced themselves that they are real hunters now and want other hunters to think they are hot shots. I suppose that could be a form of snobbery.
    Outside of the roar, I wonder how much public land hunting is actually done in the bush versus long range shooting on clearings. Social media would indicate more of the latter. Whether that's reality or not, I don't know, maybe the long distance stuff is just easier to film!?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    SI
    Posts
    1,581
    Quote Originally Posted by MB View Post
    Outside of the roar, I wonder how much public land hunting is actually done in the bush versus long range shooting on clearings. Social media would indicate more of the latter. Whether that's reality or not, I don't know, maybe the long distance stuff is just easier to film!?
    To shoot film in open country, long distance shots will require heavy lens for quality pictures, bigger and heavier than my Canon 70-200mm F2.8 lens. But in bush or say forest, small background, with Sony x80s or Alpha, Gopro mounted on shoulder height, plus one drone, two people work together can make a good story telling movie. Just, the post production work is a time consuming job, and will need a fast computer to process, intel i7, 16g ram etc....But the entire thing is quite interesting.
    So be it

  4. #4
    A Better Lover Than A Shooter Ultimitsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Less than 130 km from the sea
    Posts
    649
    Quote Originally Posted by 10-Ring View Post
    There seems to be a trend these days with many new hunters who think they,re going to shoot deer at say 600 meters with their .308 or similar powered cartridge and subsequently mount some huge Hubble type scope on it. Of course, the rifle is completely unbalanced and a liability to carry around. This big zoom scope idea is pushed by many retail sales personnel because big zoom scopes cost a lot more than a simple lightweight smaller fixed or lower magnification zoom scope. Long distance shooting is a skill that has to be mastered. Most newbies from.what I've seen, have no idea how far 600 meters actually is but they have convinced themselves that they are real hunters now and want other hunters to think they are hot shots. I suppose that could be a form of snobbery.
    What you described is not quite "snobbery". More like "uninformed".

    But one may say that insistence on shooting very long distances using under-powered scopes is also a form of snobbery

    A 308 drops 3.2 meters at 600 meters. it requires 18.3 MOA or 5.3 Mil of adjustments. It is simply impossible to get that reliably on first short without a scope that has either reliable (and easy) dialing or accurate reticle marking. I hear people on the forum say they once shot a deer with a 3-9 or 4x fixed duplex no dial scope at 600 metres. I am sure it can be done but it definitely cannot be done consistently and reliably.

    The most expensive part of hunting is time to do it. It is cheaper to spend 1K on an OK scope that get land you the hit at 600m than to waste the one trip of the year and miss that shot. To boast being able to afford to miss such shots is a much bigger flex.
    muzr257, MB, norsk and 3 others like this.

  5. #5
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultimitsu View Post
    What you described is not quite "snobbery". More like "uninformed".

    But one may say that insistence on shooting very long distances using under-powered scopes is also a form of snobbery

    A 308 drops 3.2 meters at 600 meters. it requires 18.3 MOA or 5.3 Mil of adjustments. It is simply impossible to get that reliably on first short without a scope that has either reliable (and easy) dialing or accurate reticle marking. I hear people on the forum say they once shot a deer with a 3-9 or 4x fixed duplex no dial scope at 600 metres. I am sure it can be done but it definitely cannot be done consistently and reliably.

    The most expensive part of hunting is time to do it. It is cheaper to spend 1K on an OK scope that get land you the hit at 600m than to waste the one trip of the year and miss that shot. To boast being able to afford to miss such shots is a much bigger flex.
    What I was referring to is not so much the matter of a new hunter buying a high magnification scope; more so that the idea that shooting a deer at 600m is easy pie because they have seen it on TV or read about how gun hunters do it. Of course a scope with ample magnification and good optics is going to be a huge advantage. However, it takes a lot of experiences to consistently hit your deer, tahr, goat along range. You've got wind to deal with quite often too. Not to say that a new hunter may well be a natural hot shot but I've seen more than a few newbies that can't even hit a deer at 100m or less lying down.

    Personally, I haven't bothered shooting anything over 300m for years because I'm too old and unfit to go and retrieve a deer across some huge gully or similar.
    .
    Woody, Micky Duck, flock and 1 others like this.

  6. #6
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    25,324
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultimitsu View Post
    What you described is not quite "snobbery". More like "uninformed".

    But one may say that insistence on shooting very long distances using under-powered scopes is also a form of snobbery

    A 308 drops 3.2 meters at 600 meters. it requires 18.3 MOA or 5.3 Mil of adjustments. It is simply impossible to get that reliably on first short without a scope that has either reliable (and easy) dialing or accurate reticle marking. I hear people on the forum say they once shot a deer with a 3-9 or 4x fixed duplex no dial scope at 600 metres. I am sure it can be done but it definitely cannot be done consistently and reliably.

    The most expensive part of hunting is time to do it. It is cheaper to spend 1K on an OK scope that get land you the hit at 600m than to waste the one trip of the year and miss that shot. To boast being able to afford to miss such shots is a much bigger flex.
    As a person who hunts normally with either a fixed 4x or a 3x9 with duplex....... I simply DO NOT shoot past 350 yards...the last deer was shot at 50-60 yards...the one before that was 150ish...last pig was 80ish... I can count on one hand with fingers to spare the amount of times Ive either shot or shot AT deer past 300 yards.... the last 3 times were all sucessful....

    its like hunting with a .222 or .223 you simply HAVE TO BE PREPARED to let animal walk away if shot isnt presenting itself rightly.... 100% spot on chance of good clean kill......
    get as close as you can son,then 5 yards closer....shoot them anywhere in the eye son,anywhere in the eye.....
    10-Ring, outlander, rewa and 2 others like this.
    75/15/10 black powder matters

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Optics VfM
    By yosamitesam in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-12-2021, 05:21 PM
  2. New optics
    By Trent92 in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-12-2017, 09:07 PM
  3. IOR OPTICS
    By von tempsky fan in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-11-2017, 11:57 PM
  4. Owl Optics, anyone use them?
    By stug in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 25-07-2017, 10:43 PM
  5. optics
    By jhunt in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 20-01-2014, 12:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!