Thread: Scope decision

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

ya twat

IMHO

Vortex size for size power for power are not a patch on a vx 3 or vx 6.

sorry guys but you are pulling your dick if you think they are similar optically.

Yes the Vortex do represent very good value for money in some price brackets, but they are not "as good as a vx3 or vx6" as the H&F salesmanwoman will tell you.

.

Completely useless statement just claiming "vortex"

Vortex what? Budget $200 scopes like Crossfire or $300 diamondback? $800 viper? or top line 3k+ Razor?

Originally Posted by sneeze

Completely useless statement just claiming "vortex"

Vortex what? Budget $200 scopes like Crossfire or $300 diamondback? $800 viper? or top line 3k+ Razor?

4-12 "as good as a vx6" from hunting and fishing.

Originally Posted by veitnamcam

from hunting and fishing.

Theres the biggest problem.

4-12? at best a $300 diamondback and its not as good as a $1600 vx6 ? :

Originally Posted by sneeze

Theres the biggest problem.

4-12? at best a $300 diamondback and its not as good as a $1600 vx6 ? :

Exactly

Check out some of the scope prices in Aus at the moment are not bad. I use a Bushnell LRH 3-12 X 44 its Mils, FFP works ok found them for $1000 Aus other day. Use with Bushnell Rangefinder binos set to meters and gives a fairly close ballistic adjustment for angle etc. Just dial the top and can use reticle for wind. But now I want to up-size and now "need" an illuminated reticle, the arms race to kill better never stops...

Leupold vx 3 3.5 - 10 x 40mm with CDS. Not big and not too small Baby Bear.