Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine DPT


User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 77
Like Tree70Likes

Thread: Scope musings

Threaded View

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by zeropak View Post
    @Ross Nolan I'm always open to listening to ideas which are counter to my own. I am genuinely interested in why you say that the FFP style scope is significantly better at long range. Assuming that you are using the correct ballistic data and using a decent quality scope which will dial accurately then surely the end result will be the same FFP vs SFP?
    The advantages for me of a well designed reticle - that is, one with side bars big enough to be useful at minimum magnification (possible tapered), a easy to read mill scale on both vertical and horizontal axes, side bars no more than 10 mills apart and preferably an illuminated aiming point in the centre include:
    Accurate wind holds without shifting from position to move the windage turret
    Accurate on the fly adjustments if, for example, a deer is feeding across a face and not holding a consistent distance
    Zeroing is easy at any distance, using the reticle to measure the offset from aiming point and make adjustments accordingly
    If you are using the reticle then you aren't making elevation adjustments that can be forgotten about - I've seen a shot taken, and then on the way to the animal a quick close shot miss over the top because the elevation wasn't wound back to zero

    I'd ask what advantage sfp has over ffp other than a seemingly finer aiming point at distance? I've hit magpies out to 440m using a ffp scope, so I'm not sure the small target argument holds all that much water.

    There is a bit of learning and undoing of stuff you have picked up over the years from using sfp, but for me the advantages are such that other than a fixed 4x on a 10-22 used exclusively for spotlighting possums and a red dot on a single shot 308, all of my rifles use ffp scopes.

    The great thing about this sport is that everybody is free to look at things and work out what is best for them, and it doesn't impact on anyone else's enjoyment. Go for it.

    Edit. It is probably worth mentioning that a lot of the shooting I do is at ranges where elevation adjustments are essential. If I was just bush hunting or limiting my shots to 300m, then ffp/sfp wouldn't matter.

    Extra edit. Specifically to @Zeropac regarding distance, if your wind hold is (for example) 500mm at 500m, how do you do that? Guess at that based on the animals body size? What if it is a 80kg hind, not the 55kg or so you mistakenly estimated it at? With FFP, you just hold .1 mill on the scale and let it go. The maths is easy - we come (mostly) pre configured to count in 10, and that is what mills are all about.
    Last edited by Ross Nolan; 06-12-2024 at 12:03 PM.
    flock likes this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. 30 cal magnum musings
    By csmiffy in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-04-2020, 02:57 PM
  2. 280 ross musings
    By csmiffy in forum Reloading and Ballistics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-06-2018, 06:23 PM
  3. More .22LR musings
    By MB in forum Varminting and Small Game Hunting
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 16-09-2016, 02:24 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 27-07-2015, 01:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!