it didnt mention if the lower need any modifying on the buffer tube area. but i see a gleams of hope there.Quote:
Originally Posted by dogmatix
Printable View
it didnt mention if the lower need any modifying on the buffer tube area. but i see a gleams of hope there.Quote:
Originally Posted by dogmatix
Definitely get that limited rather than destroy it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipo
You can always de-restrict it if the laws ever get repealed but you can't get it back after it is crushed.
The more firearms we can save from destruction now, by whatever means, the less damage these laws will do.
Definitely get that limited rather than destroy it.Quote:
Originally Posted by clickbang
You can always de-restrict it if the laws ever get repealed but you can't get it back after it is crushed.
The more firearms we can save from destruction now, by whatever means, the less damage these laws will do.
I would recommend getting your daughter's rifle limited rather than destroyed. The more guns we can save the better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushy
Cut that pistol grip bar off. If it's not required why have it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Philipo
Besides, it looks way cooler without the bar.
What did that come off? If it was a 3" or 3.5" gun it's possible that doesn't hold more than 5 of the biggest shells, so it might be okay.
Well I just discovered I have something I will have to hand in also.
Was taking photos to post it for sale on here as I dont use it and thought I had better just check how many it held.
I thought it held 5x 3" so all good but I got 7x 2&3/4 in it so I guess that means it will hold 6x 3".
Doesn't look very Millitary Style Semi Automatic does it.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...77063aa92d.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...2e04750966.jpg
Sent from my S60 using Tapatalk
Two points to remember, A) Check whether it actually fits 6x 3" or not. We had a customers one at one point a few years back that would hold 7x 23/4 but it would not quite hold 6 3". Second, it is worth looking into the shorter barrel, or better still, can it be chambered into a 3.5"? That would solve the issue completely if you could make it 3.5"......Quote:
Originally Posted by veitnamcam
While I guess it could have a shorter barrel or tube fitted I was goin to sell it anyway so I am not interested in faffing around with it I will just hand it in.Quote:
Originally Posted by timattalon
I am annoyed with this constant use of the term" MSSA ban" that the Police and Politicians(same thing really) and MSM keep using with no mention of all the sporting arms and heirlooms that are banned as well.
Attachment 115665
Well mines 131 years old.
Was my great grandfathers, my grandfathers, my dads, mine and now it will be Jacindas.
No, it is a very minor job to put an internal mag restrictor in without altering the originality in any way, and it may be kept and used on a standard firearms licence. Your grandkids will appreciate it! Six generations of ownership.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribrit
That is just so wrong. You should go down the family heirloom path. That rifle deserves to still be cherished by your family ten generations from now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribrit
[QUOTE=Tribrit;867553]Attachment 115665
get the mad "modified" and ti hell with the u.n infested horsed faced bitch
Any list of approved gunsmiths yet?
Thats a beautiful rifle, it would be a crime to hand it over. I hope you reconsider handing it in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribrit
Not being released until August I last heard.Quote:
Originally Posted by veitnamcam
Dont need an approved gunsmith if you are prepared to pay for it yourself. Only needs to be approved if you want your $300, or less. Personally I would be holding on to all of the pictured firearms and have them modified so no need to go anywhere near plod and his stupid rules.
Oh believe me I'll cut mine in half with my chainsaw before I let one of those cunts crush it.
No mate get it modified so as to be legal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tribrit
Instead of saying "now it will be Jacindas"Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushy
I should have said "now Jacinda wants it"
She aint getting it.
Of course Im going to have it gunsmithed.
Will be given to my eldest, along with some instructions regarding non sale and its history.
Check this out!!!! My email to local arms office.
Hi, I have 3 E cat firearms. One is not a collectors item so I am going to dispose of it during the confiscation occurring.
But I have two high end collectable WW2 rifles. I would like to know if they are able to be modified permanently to either single shot manual reload like a bolt action. Or do we have the option to deactivate them.
They word on the street is police are not approving P endorsement applications.
Hi,
Thank you for your email, apologies for the delayed response.
Yes, you are able to permanently modify your Firearms or de-activate them.
As far as I am aware, Police are issuing the 'P' Endorsement Applications, however applications for these Endorsements are to be directly submitted to PNHQ.
Kind Regards,
Tayla Adams
So what is what?? Is this legal advice I can act on? Or just one persons (who should know) opinion??
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looks like the "disclaimer" is the "as far as I am aware" part so opinion, but you are allowed to permanently modify or deactivate, so I take that as an official answer to your question in the affirmative.
Saw comments from somebody who attended a confiscation event today, said that they will no longer buy back any guns that can be modified to be compliant. Also said they wouldn't buy back his AR lower, which seems to be in line with what others are finding.
Wonder what that means if you have no interest in modifying a firearm that will be prohibited if you do not modify.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beavis
I have an average pump action that i don't really want that is on the banned list as it holds 6 + 1
Them " you can keep this if you modify it"Quote:
Originally Posted by Thirdguy
you " I don't wish to modify it you can buy it"
them " you can modify this to comply"
you " i don't want to modify it"
and............................................... ............................round and round it goes
A test to see who gives in first
I'm a bit baffled....more so than usual....does this mean I can take my NEA15 to a gunsmith, have the gas system chopped, add an Animus pump action kit,
and put it back in my safe as fully legal??
Maybe, eventually clarification may comeQuote:
Originally Posted by Max Headroom
There's always the option to surrender without paymentQuote:
Originally Posted by Thirdguy
Jesus christ, could they make this any more confusing? What a pisstake. I can't believe these tards are in charge of an entire country.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...c7f1bfdb39.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Beavis
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
One of the retired guys at the antique arms is an assessor for the buy backQuote:
Originally Posted by Beavis
Hes been instructed to encourage people with shotguns and 22's to go home and get the gun Smith to help. The don't want to pay for the gun but will do the mag. If you insist then they'll pay for the gun.
He also said that new guns are priced every 2 weeks. That's done via a Wellington committee.
And that they've been instructed to be generous. If it is in between the different levels of condition it automatically goes to the higher level pay out.
He approved used condition money for a bubba shitty hk 77. To get poor it would have to be a tomato stake. An hk 77 which had amateur hour screws, butt pad taped on and missing sights and rusty. Cracked stock. He got used as it is still fireable.
Maybe after paying out over 1 mill for stuff all guns they are running worried about going over budget so only taking what the have to take and rejecting anything they can make you go back home with or get modified.
By the time they ever get a list of "approved" gunsmiths out those gunsmiths will be swamped with work and you will be left with an illegal firearm and the amnesty over....What then?
There can't be that many gunsmiths in NZ....why is it taking so long to produce the list????
well i just pent $120 to make a lever action 22lr legal. this whole damn thing i a monumental screw upQuote:
Originally Posted by wsm junkie
Because they are fuckin uselessQuote:
Originally Posted by wsm junkie
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
I believe the procedure is that the police are going to create a set of procedures/rules/guidelines for gunsmiths, and then it is up to the gunsmith to apply to become an authorised gunsmith. And when the police grant them the right to be "authorised gunsmiths" they will then be able to modify your prohibited firearm to make it legal and be able to claim the cost back off the Govt.Quote:
Originally Posted by wsm junkie
So by the time the wallys create the rules, then gun smiths apply and be accepted by the police, I guess it takes time. Why they cant just recognise professional gun smiths and say go ahead or be able to get your mod certified or signed off by a gun smith I guess is just too easy and isnt fucking people around enough.
Or get the military armourers to do it by the time they get it sorted the amnesty will be over and they can confiscate more firearms which is what its really about anyway of they might go shit this is going to be an expencive fuk up we are spending to much you can keep tube mags how they are
Military armourer's working day =2 hours bench time, 4 hours paperwork, 2 hours smokos, lunch, etc. Civilian self-employed gunsmith's day = 6 hours bench time, 2 hours dealing with customers, 1/2 hour for lunch, another 3-4 hours bench time before going home for tea (what are smokos?), writing quotes, staff payroll, etc after tea, plus IRD paperwork for a few hours every month.Quote:
Originally Posted by northdude
Rainy shit day in Chch today, got bored so took my Browning BL-22 out to Gun Works to be modded. Dont care if I have to pay for it myself. Have ammo, and want to use it.
