For several years I've been using rather 'average' quality Bushnell BAK-4 porro prism binoculars for hunting & bird watching, namely, Legend 10x50 and Sportec 7x35. I've long desired a decent quality set that would comfortably cover both activities. However, rather than spending an exorbitant amount on alpha grade binoculars (eg. Swarovski EL 10x42, Leica Ultravid HD-Plus 10x42, Zeiss Victory HT 10x42, Nikon EDG 10x42, Steiner Wildlife XP Ultra HD 10x44) I elected to alternatively compromise on relatively comparable but less expensive units like the following;
Meopta MeoStar B1 HD 10x42, Kowa Genesis XD44 Prominar 10.5x44, and Vortex Razor HD 10x42’s.
Unfortunately, no one local retailer offers a broad range of brands for a direct hands on comparative test, hence why I essentially relied on related data and reviews submitted online by others. Following much deliberation I finally settled on the Kowa binoculars, refer; GENESIS Series?BINOCULARS | KOWA PROMINAR OFFICIAL WEB SITE
However, during my first trial viewing I soon noticed a small but distinctive 'black' chip like blemish INSIDE the right hand side lens assembly (located at the almost 3 o’clock position, just in from the perimeter). I was truly shocked and understandably disappointed because, being their premium line, I fully expected Kowa’s associated quality control to be such that obvious optical defects would be readily identified prior to being sealed and packaged in Japan - resulting in 'faulty' units being rightly withdrawn from sale. Questionably not so in this case.
I immediately emailed my concern to the online supplier and here’s an extract of his prompt and praiseworthy reply;
“I’m sorry to hear the binoculars you've received apparently are faulty in some way. I know that Kowa have a quite good quality control ‘normally’, nevertheless it happens from time to time that a faulty product comes into sale. You know, we're selling about 2000 pairs of binoculars plus 500 spotting scopes and riflescopes a year, and I can tell from (painful) experience: there´s not a single manufacturer who does a ‘100% quality control’. We've already had faulty binoculars from Swarovski, Zeiss and Leica, even a faulty TSN-883 scope from Kowa within the last 12 months, so this does happen, it clearly shouldn't but it does.
However, ‘there's no use crying over spilt milk’ here, so let´s see how we can solve this as best as possible. My first offer to you is, of course, to exchange the binoculars for another pair (which I would personally control before sending them if you agree) and take back yours at our expenses. You can return your pair, I'd refund your postage expenses (Auspost standard parcel with signature or equivalent), and we´d send another pair (and claim yours with Kowa later). Alternatively you could send your pair to the next Kowa representative to have it exchanged there and I'd refund your expenses for this procedure, but I don't want to ask that from you, so if you want to return it to us that's fine. Third option is to return your pair for a refund and choose a different make, I'd accept that too”.
For consideration, to me, that’s what I call outstanding customer service. Following subsequent emails, the supplier also appears to be quite knowledgeable and experienced in various optics. The outcome – we arranged the return shipment, he promptly refunded my related postage expenses, and soon thereafter personally inspected and posted off a fault free replacement. In short, if anyone’s interested in the highly recommended online optic (binoculars, riflescopes, spotting scopes etc) supplier’s identity, or who wants further input regarding related comparative binocular reviews/links etc, then feel free to message me. Call it a form of karma, I’m simply keen on helping others to be both well informed and confident with their equipment source.
Bookmarks