Thread: Subsonic 300blk suppression issues

Thanks for all the knowledge and replies everyone, very helpful. I think I will be looking at a faster burning, more sub suitable powder as recommended by a few. I did not realise win296 is potentially a danger when loaded down, I was going off data found from multiple American sources.
Now that I see where it sits on the burn rate chart compared to what has been suggested here it is indeed too slow, seems to be a good powder for a supersonic load with a 110grain projectile though?
I do realise my choice to shorten the barrel isn’t helping in the noise department, all suppressors I’ve tried are of the over barrel design.
No.3 - I will send you a PM regarding powder shortly.
Thanks again everyone, I will report my findings when I get my hands on a different powder.