Ok so @Kelton has got me thinking about these, so who is using them? Keen on the higher mag range ones.
I know Ryan has just got one but does anyone else have one.
I would love to know your thoughts.
Sent from my CPH1903 using Tapatalk
Ok so @Kelton has got me thinking about these, so who is using them? Keen on the higher mag range ones.
I know Ryan has just got one but does anyone else have one.
I would love to know your thoughts.
Sent from my CPH1903 using Tapatalk
I have a Z8i 2.3-18x56. I had a Zeiss Victory HT and a Victory Varipoint so wasn’t too sure about the Swarovski but I am very happy with it. Bit of a leap of faith buying one as it is very difficult to view one prior to buying it. If anything the reticle is a bit finer than the Zeiss but the illuminated dot is more adjustable and great in low light.
sorry mate iv being having dirty thoughts myself it woke me up at 3am where I started justifying it to myself
Love mine, you pull it out of the box and it just feels quality, the glass is the best you will get and it dials flawless. Turret is awesome, I run it most the time with turret off but nice being able to just push it on and you're set for a long shot. Illumination is very nice and intuitive having it on the eyepiece and it's super sharp and crisp with no bleeding. I have the L 4A-F reticle which can switch between an illuminated circle with centre dot or centre dot only
270 is a harmonic divisor number[1]
270 is the fourth number that is divisible by its average integer divisor[2]
270 is a practical number, by the second definition
The sum of the coprime counts for the first 29 integers is 270
270 is a sparsely totient number, the largest integer with 72 as its totient
Given 6 elements, there are 270 square permutations[3]
10! has 270 divisors
270 is the smallest positive integer that has divisors ending by digits 1, 2, …, 9.
What good timing. I was coming on here to post a photo of a friends scope for sale. It is a Z8i 2.3-18x56 with Ballistic Turret, illuminated, lens covers and L BRX Reticle.
As new condition and has never been mounted (he is a collector as opposed to a shooter)
He is wanting $4200 for it.
Good price but the 56mm is blimen large
Very very good price with bt and lens covers
In fairness, i thought the same, but the Swarovski 56 somehow isnt like other brands. It seems in proportion and smaller.
The 3.5-28x50 must be epic.
I have the 3.5-28x50 on my 7mm LRM its unreal! great glass with a wicked mag range and exudes quality and does not weigh a ton.
It replaced a NX8 which i was very happy with but this has better balance on the rifle and better glass too.
Bookmarks