Thread: Talk me out of a March scope

Same 100y zero. Don't want different rifles with different zero's. I would get the FFP March. So good for reticle on any zoom

Just had a look this evening at two new Swarovski Z5i at my local hunting and Fishing in Hamilton, one in 2.5-12-50 and the other 3.5-18-44 , both with the 4w reticle, ballistic turret and illuminated center dot. Really really nice scopes. 2290 and 2490 respectively.

Come look at my March @robhughes-games it’s the model your looking at. I have 2 Kahles K624i to compare and a March Genesis.

Originally Posted by Cowboy06

Come look at my March @robhughes-games it’s the model your looking at. I have 2 Kahles K624i to compare and a March Genesis.

im there mate. pm coming

Ive got the 42 and i'll never sell it. It focusses down to 3y, its lighter than any other and its as hardy as nightforce. They've been around for ages and im yet to see any complaints about reticles or clicks etc. I find its absolutely fine at dusk.

The only thing i will say is that the 'eyebox' is going to be something that suits just you. Once its set up.

My 2c, FFP any day of the week. I positively can not understand why anyone would still go SFP or 1/4 (imperial). MRAD is just too easy to use at any range.

Have had a March 3-24 ffp here for a week now and while a grwat scope the paralax is a bit of a pain. In the bush if something was at 50m away and you are set to 30 you'd be hard pressed to see it i think. Very touch on the low end. So now need a swaro but with decent turrets with positive clicks