Thread: Tikka t3 ss or Sako a7

Thanks for all the feed back. Will be looking at a t3 with a better scope. Have abit of shooting experience behind me but in saying that most of it has been with heavy stocks than the t3. I have also heard the kick on the t3 270 is nasty. Any views on this, and would a limbsaver alone be enough or better to get it suppressed? Thank you

Originally Posted by HFWaikato

Thanks for all the feed back. Will be looking at a t3 with a better scope. Have abit of shooting experience behind me but in saying that most of it has been with heavy stocks than the t3. I have also heard the kick on the t3 270 is nasty. Any views on this, and would a limbsaver alone be enough or better to get it suppressed? Thank you

Put it this way a t3 7-08 gave me recoil flinch a few years ago, if you do end up buying one buy it with a mac millan stock... or alternatively buy a hogue stocked HOWA! I find the howa's kick alot less and will shoot just as accurately, add to that a 3 position safety and the ability to make it take 10 round mags in short action... you cannot go wrong!

Originally Posted by Rock river arms hunter

Put it this way a t3 7-08 gave me recoil flinch a few years ago, if you do end up buying one buy it with a mac millan stock... or alternatively buy a hogue stocked HOWA! I find the howa's kick alot less and will shoot just as accurately, add to that a 3 position safety and the ability to make it take 10 round mags in short action... you cannot go wrong!

you you read the shit you say before you dribble it out?

Originally Posted by HFWaikato

Thanks for all the feed back. Will be looking at a t3 with a better scope. Have abit of shooting experience behind me but in saying that most of it has been with heavy stocks than the t3. I have also heard the kick on the t3 270 is nasty. Any views on this, and would a limbsaver alone be enough or better to get it suppressed? Thank you

Lots of people recon the tikkas boot but I honestly cant tell the difference between my mates 7mm rem mag tikka and my 308 sako 85.
they both go bang and give you a push. I reckon its the noise or poor technique letting the rifle slap you(but mostly the noise) that creates a flinch.
My 2 cents

Originally Posted by HFWaikato

Thanks for all the feed back. Will be looking at a t3 with a better scope. Have abit of shooting experience behind me but in saying that most of it has been with heavy stocks than the t3. I have also heard the kick on the t3 270 is nasty. Any views on this, and would a limbsaver alone be enough or better to get it suppressed? Thank you

Recoil is a very subjective thing- everyone has different levels of comfort/tolerance.
It also depends how much you are going to shoot it. If you're going to do a lot of range work or high volume shooting (like goats or rabbits) then recoil will be more of an issue. If you are only going to pull the trigger 6 times a year on a deer it won't be such a problem. (Anectdotally: A lot of people will tell you that when you shoot at an animal you will hardly notice the recoil 'in the heat of the moment', as opposed to punching paper. Personally I've found this to be true).
Rifle weight as well as cartridge calibre/power is a very big factor also. I won't bore you with the maths, but if you think simply in terms of "equal and opposite" forces a heavier rifle will boot you less, quite noticeably for only a small increase in weight. This is a downside to the current trend of lightweight rifles.

In terms of your question: "would a limbsaver alone be enough or better to get it suppressed?" That really depends on your personal preference. My experience has been that a decent suppressor will reduce perceived recoil at least as much as a limbsaver, with the added benefit of being easier on everyone's ears. I don't enjoy recoil much at all, and quite like my hearing- so I start with a suppressor, and then add a better pad if it still needs it.