Won’t go wrong with that Woody punch well above there size.
Printable View
Won’t go wrong with that Woody punch well above there size.
Whew. Thanks @ariki.
Theyve always been out of reach for me and this sh one was a stretch to hope its a goody. There will probably be a couple of bits of my othet gear fs on here soon, to help the wallet a bit ha ha.
Yeah if you were purely a bush hunter you wouldn’t choose one. But they are an inch shorter than a 3-15 or 3-18 and and don’t have the Hubble-like bulkiness of a 50 or 56mm objective. I ran a 2-7x33 for many years but the small eye box and lack of top end magnification pissed me off in the end; the 2-12 is a better all rounder for the type of hunting I doQuote:
Originally Posted by 10-Ring
Attachment 148217
The end result. Lovely low mount (2mm clearance) 2.5-10*32 NF
:)
May I ask what is the problem with 30mm tube? It usually would not affect mounting height because your objective glass will be larger than 30mm anyway. 30mm tube in the middle section of the scope would is only a few grams heavier than a 25.4mm tube. 30mm tubes usually offers more elevation adjustments so that they can be mounted on a wider range of rifles and wider range of zeros without running out of adjustments. running out of adjustments is a headache for both the consumer and retailers because usually when this happens the retailer is (at least morally) obligated to either refund or exchange. All that extra work increases costs which gets built into the price, and weakens the customer experience. This I think is probably the main driving factor behind everything moving to 30mm tube.
@Woody I have been watching this thread with interest because I have a similar project brewing .Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody
A compact scope with most of the features you outlined . Particularly 1" for reasons of scale and style.
308 ish caliber to 400m so maybe need up to 12 or 15 power
Then you veered of script and chose a 30mm tube scope !
Looks good though and I'm sure it ticks all the other boxes
Cheers
I was able to buy a set of very low S&L slide and lock mounts for it allowing same cheek weld as the vx3 2.-8*36. The glass is very good. The fine reticle allows precise aiming at any practical range so am a happy chappie. A bit fine for bush but reticle is illuminated so should be ok. Lucky to get a tidy second hand one that I could afford.
What did you replace it with? @10-RingQuote:
Originally Posted by 10-Ring
I have a VX6HD 3-18x44 im thinking of selling
Iv got both the 2-7x33 vxr and vx3 2.5-8x33 and the vxr is so much betterQuote:
Originally Posted by akaroa1
But once again it's 30mm so may not suit
It's a small scope in general but it's proportions make it look even smaller with the 30mm tube
Attachment 148304
@Woody I would be keen for a mini review mate if you have the time
@Bill999 I have a VXR 1-4x24 on my 223, I really rate it for other than the thick crosshairs, I had the same scope as you before and found the crosshair thickness more manageable however. Interestingly enough the VXR the only leupold model series that I actually like.
Attachment 148312
Size comparison of the 2-12x42 vx6, 2.5-8x36 vx 111, vxr 2-7x32
My favourite bieng the last of the three
@Timmay. I have not used this NF NXS in the bush yet but have zeroed it at 200m on my 6.5*55. .6moa group no ptoblem snd dialing ok. Turret adjustment easy with only a single lock screw per turret. Mine has turret caps but exposed zero stop turrets are an option.There are several reticle options and some are for military or very long range and too fine for general hunting so be careful what you choose.
As far as I know all NF reticles can be illuminated and regulated brightnes. The " compact" version I have is 12" long and weighs 19 oz. Eye relief is similar to Leupolds at 95mmand better than many other brands. Fov is good. Eyebox adjustment is easy and secure.
Mounting length is good at 5.7". Elevation snd widage can be either moa or mills and the range on mine is great at 100moa!
The 2.5-10*32 Compact NXS is no longer listed and has been replaced by a 2.5-10*42. For my purpises if I could not have obtained a SH 32mm front end I would have looked for a vxr with 33mmfront end or gome for a 1 or 2 - 6 or 8 * 24 or 28. If Staying with 1" tube its hard to find an objective other than 20mm then up to36 &40 & 42+.
I have seen sh NF Compacts offshore for around US$12-1300.
NF are now marketing a simpler scopefor the hunting market and thes are more economically priced. Hardy Rifles in NZ are the Agent for these. The scope I bough sh is probably 5-12 years old but in v good condition.
Alternatives could be the Delta 2-6*24 or similar and I believe a shipment of these is due in NZ in the next week or so.
The ultimate low mount high quality scope is likely the S& B 1-8*24 but very pricey; (for me at least :).
If Leupold had a vx5hd illum reticle zl2 in 2-8*30ish I would not hestitate to buy one.
Just a Leupold VX3i 3.5-10x42 CDS. Not quite as good optically and a smaller eye box but much lighter and good enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by hotsoup
New Burris Fullfield 4 in a 2.5-10x42 with illuminated turret. Photos in the S20 thread. Great unit that has had great feedback from retailers so far. I have ordered one for my rifle as the glass is great, warranty is fantastic, small, light weight and slim.
@Ultimitsu .In answer to your question about 30mmm vs 25 mm. The radius of 30mm is 15mm and the radius of 25m is 12.5m. This puts the centre of the 30mm 2 1/2mm higher. ( about 1/8th inch and is enough to lose cheek weld because the head must be raised to view through the scope. The onky way to achieve a low equivalant mount iS to use a 30mm scipe with objective bell diameter of approx 5mm less than say the 40mm comon to 1" tubes. This is why I found the 32mm acceptable.
For the sake of the ideal scope surely it wouldn't be hard to raise the cheek weld 2.5mm?
Yes, and have done so on some rifles. However, it then comes down to ergonomics of gun fit. Competative shotgunners are very fussy about this. The design and fit of a stock are relavent to the shooter and also shooting position, for instace prine vs standing. Most hunting rifles and shotgun stocks are built to " average shooter body shape , ie a compromise. That is why high end target rifles and shotguns such as TRG , GRS or Perazzi have adjustable combs, LOP etc. What I try to do is combine my sight view with gun fit and my common shooting positions. My favourite bush rifle is somewhat different to rifle I use for longer range prone shooting. Dedicated target shooting is a completely different shape. Gun fitting is an art form developed over the ages. Same with boots and saddles, spades and hats.
The particular scope I have recently bought is specifically for a 6.5*55 which I mainly use for moderately long range open country shooting from prone or sitting position and fits me well for that purpose.
@mcche171 That Burris seems really good bang for buck!
Nice. Just bought one of these for my 243, naybe put one on my rem mag too. Prib plenty of scope put to 500Quote:
Originally Posted by 10-Ring
