Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Terminator Alpine


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 47
Like Tree72Likes

Thread: Who would still buy MOA over MIL and why?

  1. #31
    Member 199p's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    4,305
    MOA and Subways for hold just works so well together
    BRADS likes this.
    Konus binoculars " The power to imagine"

  2. #32
    Member BRADS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Central Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    9,562
    Quote Originally Posted by 199p View Post
    MOA and Subways for hold just works so well together
    Moa or Mil for me its simply a measurement that the phone works out for what I do can happily change between them all day.
    But aim a subway high is still the go two, only gets confusing if the shooter is thinking 6 inch instead of a philipo foot long

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    jakewire likes this.

  3. #33
    Full of shit Ryan_Songhurst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    South Island
    Posts
    10,384
    Doesnt bother me, currently use Mil, doesnt sound as cool in meters though yards sounds furtherer
    270 is a harmonic divisor number[1]
    270 is the fourth number that is divisible by its average integer divisor[2]
    270 is a practical number, by the second definition
    The sum of the coprime counts for the first 29 integers is 270
    270 is a sparsely totient number, the largest integer with 72 as its totient
    Given 6 elements, there are 270 square permutations[3]
    10! has 270 divisors
    270 is the smallest positive integer that has divisors ending by digits 1, 2, …, 9.

  4. #34
    Member Nathan F's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    2,313
    MOA because im too long in the tooth to be bothered learning new tricks

  5. #35
    Member dogmatix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Northern Gaul (Pukekohe)
    Posts
    6,093
    Quote Originally Posted by caberslash View Post
    Whatever you do, avoid a MIL reticle and MOA turret scope (looking at you Leupold Mk4..., although some S&B PMII's had this 'feature' too!)

    It's a hangover from early 2000's US military doctrine, and has aged about as well as early 2000's fashion trends...

    Attachment 185358
    The fashion has aged better than Britney.
    caberslash likes this.
    Welcome to Sako club.

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    South taranaki
    Posts
    433
    I shoot both.
    Hunting rifles are moa.
    Comp guns are mil.
    Only because thats what the majority of competitors use and makes shot calling easier.
    Using Tapatalk

  7. #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    84
    I did my apprenticeship in an engineering shop on old machinery with imperial dials so I understand MOA, and until recently I've generally bought older quality scopes second hand (so they tend to be MOA). That said, I'd be equally happy with mil but in the interests of consistency across my rifles I just stick with MOA. It works for me so I see no need to change, but I've pushed my son down the mil path as he's most decidedly a product of the metric age (and if I use his rifle I can do the conversions in my head after years of doing it at work).

  8. #38
    Member Puffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    1,020
    Any scale would work for me as long as the look-up table, corrections, and reticle subtensions were consistent. I don't use scopes for ranging though - or determining the size of targets. If I did then metric would surely be the more straightforward.

    I can better the above-mentioned 0.85 error; how about 0.68x on a MOA Leica? Again, I could have worked with it, but it made me wonder what else could be wrong, so the scope was replaced.

  9. #39
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    633
    I just bought my first imperial scope
    after being a devout milrad fan for 10 years.
    The reason, i bought a red dot for my
    45-70 takedown (holosun 510c). It clicks at .5moa and im
    absolutely fine with that. Basically
    A full bullet hole per click for this cal.
    I can manage about 15-20 shots of this thing
    before im done for the day so im just
    happy to be on the orange 1" sticker.

    Name:  Screenshot_20211216-231748_Samsung Experience Home.jpg
Views: 157
Size:  86.5 KB
    Name:  Screenshot_20211216-231918_Samsung Experience Home.jpg
Views: 151
Size:  205.9 KB
    Last edited by T.FOYE; 16-12-2021 at 11:19 PM.
    Micky Duck likes this.

 

 

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!