Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Night Vision NZ Ammo Direct


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 58
Like Tree107Likes

Thread: Why have a suppressor?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxx View Post
    Useful post!

    Interested in how you manage you longer shots with those rifles? In asking that I'm assuming the trajectory has been adversely affected by docking the barrels. Do you 'dial' your scopes, hold over, or use a reticule other than a plex ?
    Thanks @Maxx,

    Yes the velocity is obviously less with the shorter barrel, but the change in trajectory is very easily allowed for by dialing the scope turret to adjust for the bullet drop. In the case of the 17" 284win, by running a high bc projectile, even tho it starts out slower than it would if i run a 140gr, due to the high bc projectile slipping through the air better it hangs onto its velocity longer and therefore hangs onto its retained energy, hence the 1000 ft-lbs at 900 yards (that's at my normal hunting altitudes).

    Heres a little recent video of some gong shooting with a couple of my rifles, one being a 22" barreled 7mm SAUM, and my 17" barreled 284.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeoqULlzDN8

    Both rifles using the 162gr Amax, only difference is the SAUM pushs it at 3,005 fps as opposed to the short 284 at 2,740 fps. In this video we shoot a gong at 637 yards with both rifles.

    The 7mmSAUM required 9.75 MOA of up adjustment on the turret, while the 17" 284 required an adjustment of 12.5 MOA. In theroy the SAUM hit the target with 1,674 ft-lbs of energy, while the short 284 had 1,355 ft-lbs. Obviously there is a windage advantage to the faster bullet too.

    Once you get the hang of dialing, it makes it pretty easy, the hardest part is always the wind.

    I have dial-able scopes on all my rifles now, and even the .223 with a 55gr bullet is no drama to hit little gongs at 600 yards. Dial-able scopes dont have to be super expensive to work well. I have $300 Vortex diamondback scopes on 3 rifles including the .223 and they dial very accurately and repeatably. They dont have big exposed target turrets, but for rifles that are mostly bush hunters you dont really want that, but having the ability to dial up the correction for a shot across a gully at 450 yards when needed is bloody good. Of course if you want to spend more $ on a scope the sky is the limit, but its not essential to get into dialing.
    Last edited by GWH; 04-05-2017 at 11:48 AM.
    viper and MrSly like this.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Which Suppressor?
    By LifeLust in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 27-01-2014, 07:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!