Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Alpine Darkness


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34
Like Tree65Likes

Thread: Why I wouldn't buy Weaver or Nikon scopes...

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Cartman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    wanaka
    Posts
    2,105
    Like he's got a point I just don't know if it needs to be said. Everyone with half a clue knows what they're getting into buying 2nd hand optics. As for me I'd happily buy either brand for the right money. nikon especially fly under the radar in this country.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    superdiver and dannyb like this.

  2. #2
    Member Hermitage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Cartman View Post
    Everyone with half a clue knows what they're getting into buying 2nd hand optics.
    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    Although I'm not a fan of Leupold tracking, one just has to be a fan of their warranty...same with Vortex. So buying 2nd hand scopes from some brands is no gamble whatsoever....in fact buying a 2nd hand leupold is nearly as good as buying new.
    A good job and a good wife has been the ruin of many a good hunter.

  3. #3
    Member Cartman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    wanaka
    Posts
    2,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermitage View Post
    Although I'm not a fan of Leupold tracking, one just has to be a fan of their warranty...same with Vortex. So buying 2nd hand scopes from some brands is no gamble whatsoever....in fact buying a 2nd hand leupold is nearly as good as buying new.
    And most people know that. And you pay for it when buying new or 2nd hand. Like I said is what it is. Vortex though , they just had to do it or they would be out of business. Replacing scopes was probably easier than fixing production.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    6x47 likes this.

  4. #4
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermitage View Post
    Although I'm not a fan of Leupold tracking, one just has to be a fan of their warranty...same with Vortex. So buying 2nd hand scopes from some brands is no gamble whatsoever....in fact buying a 2nd hand leupold is nearly as good as buying new.
    Well this just isn’t true.

    Vortex (Aus/NZ) has a very well documented history of declining warranty claims on the basis of no proof of purchase, contrary to what it says on the American website that everyone assumes applies to all international markets.

    The Australian and New Zealand market is controlled by ExtraVision, who have in the past have been very sniffy about scopes potentially acquired in the grey market or imported directly from overseas. Several members on this forum have had problems along these lines. The Broncos situation is also one for the annals, being that they buy direct from the US and circumvent ExtraVision, annoying the Vortex distributor and their retailers immensely!

    Buying a secondhand Vortex without proof of purchase in NZ/Aus and then trying on a warranty claim is therefore a risk with an uncertain outcome. Some guys have been successful sending their un-receipted scopes back to ExtraVision, or direct to Vortex in the USA, whereas other guys have been unsuccessful. Lots written about this that I guess if you had read and digested you would be aware of.

    That said, I am in awe of your ability to start a largely pointless thread on a Sunday arvo!
    Just...say...the...word

  5. #5
    Member Hermitage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyblown View Post
    That said, I am in awe of your ability to start a largely pointless thread on a Sunday arvo!
    Well @Flyblown it looks like you and @Nickoli don't appreciate my contribution to the forum and are happy to put them down.

    I put it to you both that the members on this forum should know that their primary role is to interact and encourage interaction, to encourage member involvement, and to encourage a sense of community.

    However, it seems to me that the main role/priority of both of you is to put others down over their writtings. At least there is a contribution....why don't you write a few articles to contribute to the community rather than just add to the negativity?

    I'm heading out for a evening shoot in 20 mins but don't tell @Nickoli as he will think I am making it up....
    A good job and a good wife has been the ruin of many a good hunter.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Central Otago
    Posts
    2,345
    I have a Weaver 3x on my .300 Blk and a P223 Nikon on my .223 and am very happy with them. So long as I don't do anything stupid they should see me out, and I don't have a warranty either!

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Godzone, South Island
    Posts
    1,705
    Well, Im gonna disagree with Hermitage, I have had a number of Weaver scopes over the years and cant fault them. Never had any warranty issues whatsoever. My first was a 3X Micro Trac way back in 1976, still on my mates 22 and it gets used and abused on his work 22. It has never failed. At last count I had 12 Weavers, cos quite simply they represented the best value for money scope in times when I didn't have that much money. Would buy a second hand Weaver again if I considered the price was right, hell yes! A warranty doesnt worry me in the slightest, if it breaks, it breaks, so what.
    Not too sure about the Nikon's, I was too fixated on buying Weavers to look at Nikon's.
    257weatherby and Steffan like this.

  8. #8
    GWH
    GWH is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Napier, Hawkes Bay
    Posts
    4,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Husky1600 View Post
    Well, Im gonna disagree with Hermitage, I have had a number of Weaver scopes over the years and cant fault them. Never had any warranty issues whatsoever. My first was a 3X Micro Trac way back in 1976, still on my mates 22 and it gets used and abused on his work 22. It has never failed. At last count I had 12 Weavers, cos quite simply they represented the best value for money scope in times when I didn't have that much money. Would buy a second hand Weaver again if I considered the price was right, hell yes! A warranty doesnt worry me in the slightest, if it breaks, it breaks, so what.
    Not too sure about the Nikon's, I was too fixated on buying Weavers to look at Nikon's.
    I fully agree, i use a few Weaver scopes, a 4.5-14 Grandslam, and several SuperSlams, a couple in 2-10 and a couple of 3-15's and also a 4-20x50. Ive found them to be super reliable, great quality scopes, nice glass, accurate and repeatable dialing, and the pull-up to turn/Push down to lock turrets on the Superslams work super well for hunting.

    I believe a 2nd hand Weaver Grandslam or Superslam in good condition to offer far better performance and value than many other newer scope manufacturers

    Quote Originally Posted by Flyblown View Post



    BTW if I come across a good Weaver GrandSlam hunting scope, I’ll snap it up. Great scopes.
    Sorry, mines not for sale.
    257weatherby likes this.

  9. #9
    Member Cartman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    wanaka
    Posts
    2,105
    I would add although Burris have a great warranty and product in my opinion. The small print mentions their warranty is only valid in North America.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    nor-west and Steve123 like this.

  10. #10
    Member Rock river arms hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    2,317
    Quote Originally Posted by Cartman View Post
    I would add although Burris have a great warranty and product in my opinion. The small print mentions their warranty is only valid in North America.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    I had a chip on the lense of my SixX 2-12. God knows how I did it but anyhow.

    I paid shipping one way, full repair and no questions asked. Would happily buy another in a heart beat.

    I didn't read the fine print but Berretta the agents looked after me. Not saying you're wrong either mate.
    Cartman likes this.

  11. #11
    Member Cartman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    wanaka
    Posts
    2,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Rock river arms hunter View Post
    I had a chip on the lense of my SixX 2-12. God knows how I did it but anyhow.

    I paid shipping one way, full repair and no questions asked. Would happily buy another in a heart beat.

    I didn't read the fine print but Berretta the agents looked after me. Not saying you're wrong either mate.
    Yeah I had a mate import one and he showed me it. I'm glad it came good for you.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Bay of Plenty
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by Cartman View Post
    I would add although Burris have a great warranty and product in my opinion. The small print mentions their warranty is only valid in North America.

    Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
    Maybe it says that on the warranty but I don't think that is how it is applied.

    I bought a Burris 2-7 in the late seventies, it was a good scope but found itself utilised as a replacement on an AR for another brand of scope that had succumbed to vibration, this one went the same way and was sent to Burris in the US for repair by the then NZ agent. It never returned and was deemed lost by Burris with the NZ agent offering, on behalf of Burris, to replace it with a new scope of the same value. I got a new Burris Signature for an additional $100 and used it until the vertical erector failed last roar. I took this scope to H&F who returned it to Bretta NZ who deemed it irrepearable and gave me a new Burris 2-10 Signature in replacement. So for the scope I paid maybe $300 for about 40 years ago I have the latest version of a better model at the total cost of $100 to me.
    Just going to take a look around the next bend...

  13. #13
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,346


    At least you make me laugh… for that you are a guaranteed winner mate, so thank you!
    Just...say...the...word

  14. #14
    Member Hermitage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Whakatane
    Posts
    1,012
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyblown View Post


    At least you make me laugh… for that you are a guaranteed winner mate, so thank you!
    And I must admit to not understanding your specific kind of arrogance and sense of humour, but I do admire your total commitment to it.

    Ok time for the hills...
    A good job and a good wife has been the ruin of many a good hunter.

  15. #15
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,346


    You’ll get there in the end buddy.

    BTW if I come across a good Weaver GrandSlam hunting scope, I’ll snap it up. Great scopes.
    nor-west and 257weatherby like this.
    Just...say...the...word

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Nikon or Weaver
    By cmore in forum Firearms, Optics and Accessories
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-09-2012, 11:15 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!