Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Ammo Direct Night Vision NZ


User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 187
Like Tree251Likes

Thread: New Hilux Fuel Consumption

  1. #46
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by stagstalker View Post
    After 9 months of waiting we finally got our new hilux a week and a half ago. Really loving everything about the vehicle so far except one thing, at 1000km on the clock she is drinking 13L per 100km with no load and doing mostly open driving with some short town transits. Automatic transmission.

    As seen in the photo it has a bit of extra weight: Bullbar, winch, snorkel, under vehicle protection, steel side steps, canopy, old man emu suspension upgrade/lift, maxxis razr AT811 265x70r17 tyres (40 PSI front, 38 PSI rear), etc.

    Based on the mods above I knew it would drink more then normal but when the specs say 7L highway, 9.4L city and a combined average of 7.9L, I thought it was reasonable to expect something along the lines of 11L per 100 for my setup. I get those figures are almost always ambitious but my Holden ran at 9.5L with M/T tyres in the same size and a canopy and snorkel on it..

    So there lies my question to any other newer model hilux users, how is your consumption and did it improve much as it ticked up some km and broke in?
    I was told when i brought a new vehicle that it won't settle down and free up till around 20,000km and then fuel economy should improve.

    Sent from my CPH2145 using Tapatalk
    tetawa and stagstalker like this.

  2. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by stagstalker View Post
    Thanks for all the input so far. Interesting to see the numbers from others. Honestly i’m not convinced that 13L to 100 is to be expected. I fully understand that it will be a chunk more due to the mods but I really can’t rationalise it being that much. I know of a few other trucks with mates very similar with bullbars winches snorkels and big muds etc that don’t run this thirsty. Talking to my mate today who has a lifted amarok with winch, bullbar, snorkel, 33” big mud terrain tyres and when I told him what I was getting his jaw dropped as he’s on 10.2L… It’s early days and maybe it needs to be really run in and get some hard working km on the clock. 11 - 12 I can accept as an increase over the stated 7.9 in specifications but shit 13.. should have just bought a landcruiser hahah
    Or better still a Ranger

    Sent from my CPH2145 using Tapatalk

  3. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Auckland but from the Mainland
    Posts
    3,790
    I’ll let you know what my 4.5 ltr landcruiser figures are tomorrow.
    Maca49 likes this.

  4. #49
    Member Danny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Central NI
    Posts
    5,087
    The GPS on my work Hilux has the speedo out by 10km so that would push things out as far as consumption is concerned. Either way >12+/L isn’t flash I’d suggest regardless of a winch etc.
    stagstalker likes this.
    Dan M

  5. #50
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,339
    Biggest mistake you’re making @stagstalker is comparing other makes to yours. That’s a complete non-starter. Totally different engines in many respects.
    stagstalker likes this.
    Just...say...the...word

  6. #51
    Member hotbarrels's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Auck
    Posts
    1,792
    Quote Originally Posted by bigbear View Post
    The forward facing snorkel are designed to force clean air in.
    Also a snorkel is meant to increase fuel efficiency.
    A snorkel is designed to keep water out of your engine when you are wading in deep water. As a bonus, in dusty conditions at reasonable speed, they will reduce the dust intake. They are restrictive to air flow and if added to a stock engine with no other mods to counter their restrictive nature, will pull back horsepower and reduce economy.

  7. #52
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Flyblown View Post
    Biggest mistake you’re making @stagstalker is comparing other makes to yours. That’s a complete non-starter. Totally different engines in many respects.
    For sure. Another good mate has a 2019 hilux built practically identical to mine but with BP-51 suspension instead. Last we spoke his was 10 point something but I need to follow up with him again to see if that’s still accurate. I think he had a tune done though to be fair. But yea hence why Im wondering if maybe it does need to be looked at or just get some more km on the clock.

  8. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Auckland but from the Mainland
    Posts
    3,790
    Curiosity got the better of me, went upstairs and checked what my 4.5 ltr V8 drinks and it’s all bad news for you Hilux drivers.
    An economical 13.8 Litres per 100km and that’s in shitty Auckland traffic with the boot up it when given a chance.
    Name:  ECE3C97B-161D-4D9E-A8BA-BE52182DD5DE.jpeg
Views: 297
Size:  1.25 MB
    Trout and stagstalker like this.

  9. #54
    Member stagstalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    North Island, New Zealand
    Posts
    2,196
    Mate just sent me a photo. As mentioned his is practically identical to mine and it’s on 10.9L with not the most efficient type of driving. But yeah his has been tuned too I think.
    Last edited by stagstalker; 28-06-2022 at 08:43 PM.

  10. #55
    Member Flyblown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Waikato
    Posts
    3,339
    Quote Originally Posted by stagstalker View Post
    For sure. Another good mate has a 2019 hilux built practically identical to mine but with BP-51 suspension instead. Last we spoke his was 10 point something but I need to follow up with him again to see if that’s still accurate. I think he had a tune done though to be fair. But yea hence why Im wondering if maybe it does need to be looked at or just get some more km on the clock.
    You'll need to put stock tyres back on it to see if there's a problem.

    Shouldn't be too hard to do. Someone will have some.

    Huge variations in tyre / fuel relationship. Rubber compounds can vary from batch to batch within the same brand.

    Process of elimination will get you there.
    Just...say...the...word

  11. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    21,180
    Quote Originally Posted by 7mmwsm View Post
    I'm running a 4.5 litre flat deck cruiser and got 780km for 95 litres on the last tank. By my calculations that's a bit over 8 litres /100 km. About 200 km of that was towing about a tonne.
    Quite happy with that. Although I only drive at about 90 km/hour normally.
    Your gonna piss people off at that speed,
    veitnamcam likes this.
    Boom, cough,cough,cough

  12. #57
    Member Micky Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Geraldine
    Posts
    24,874
    Quote Originally Posted by Maca49 View Post
    Your gonna piss people off at that speed,
    well them people can just "piss off" themselves...... not overly hard to pass someone who is consistantly sitting 10kmph below where you want to sit.....
    75/15/10 black powder matters

  13. #58
    Member Bobba's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Ngaruawahia
    Posts
    1,304
    Before you go digging to deep into potential issues I would get a scan gauge to give you accurate readings. I have one in my ranger and gives quite different readings to the inbuilt computer. Simple and easy to install yourself.

    https://www.stahlcar.nz/scangauge
    7mmwsm and 20 Bore like this.

  14. #59
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    379
    Quote Originally Posted by stagstalker View Post
    Mate just sent me a photo. As mentioned his is practically identical to mine and it’s on 10.9L with not the most efficient type of driving. But yeah his has been tuned too I think.
    Mine is similar set up to yours. Steel Rims and same size and brand of tyres as yours. Bull bar but no winch or snorkel. Hard lid instead of canopy. Getting about 10.5 without the off road kms. Stock engine with no tune.

    Run it in and check again I’d say
    tetawa, Micky Duck and stagstalker like this.

  15. #60
    Member Savage1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Whangarei
    Posts
    3,493
    An LC200 I drive uses about 15L/100km, it has full steel ARB bar and winch, wrap around steel running boards, stock wheels but has a lift, about 100kg of kit in it and normally 4 guys.

    Makes me cringe at the pump, I reckon it uses close on double what my RC Colorado uses, They do sound nice though.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Cooking without fuel
    By Pengy in forum Game Cooking and Recipes
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-07-2017, 09:48 PM
  2. New hilux wheels, onto an older model hilux
    By kimjon in forum Projects and Home Builds
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-09-2015, 07:24 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Welcome to NZ Hunting and Shooting Forums! We see you're new here, or arn't logged in. Create an account, and Login for full access including our FREE BUY and SELL section Register NOW!!