More importantly what one?
Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk
Printable View
More importantly what one?
Sent from my GT-I9300T using Tapatalk
Its about 35l , might be a x1?
Nice.
Haha take the boy hunting gets tired, "jump in the pack son"
Take the boy hunting, use him as a mule.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby
Bloody hell , you guys over there are Flash , do you all have your own Sherpa's ?Quote:
Originally Posted by veitnamcam
:)
Ken
Ground control not all of us have Sherpas but there is a new fad of Sherpa time share taking off. Ha ha ha ha
Unfortunately we don't all have them but Rushy has a couple.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ground Control
Good thread cam, just used all suggestions and the thread stug linked and made a huge difference.
Interestingly I was in Cactus the other day talking to the staff and they were saying that getting the weight low, the traditional approach may have some benefit in terms of CG, but puts more strain on your lower back, and is more tiring if you are covering distance. Their comment was get the weighty stuff close to your back and up around shoulder height (not above it) and this will put you into a more leaning forward position which is less tiring. I do know the effect of a heavy pack with weight low... a sore lower back is almost always the result..
My comment was about the extra weight up high moving around in difficult terrain and the response was it shouldn't move if your pack fits properly and is adjusted correctly.
I think I will try it and see... the other comment made was that you shoulders should do most of the work and the contents of the pack should be secure...
Fixed it for you RushyQuote:
Originally Posted by Rushy
Yep ill have my very own in a couple more years :thumbup::DQuote:
Originally Posted by Ground Control
Ill have a look at the Vid when i get home. Standing around with a thousand other people and kids at the mo
That has been true on more than one occasion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby
