I've never used a Magellan. I've had a Garmin Oregon 450 and now have the Oregon 650. Both are rock solid in the bush. 3-5m accuracy most of the time.
The 450 has a resistive touch screen, which is a shittier form of touchscreen than the capacitive touchscreen on the 650 - same tech as smartphone screens, just not the same stupidly high res display.
What has attracted you to the 62s, with it's (IMO) sucky button interface and display, vs a new generation Oregon with multitouch?
Bookmarks