Thread: fish and game elections

Originally Posted by Tim Allen

Mike offered his opinion GSPF. This simply hasn't come up before that I am aware of. There is an election in HB, so if that was the intent it worked. There is an election with 8 candidates. Nothing changes that. Elections underpin the very fabric of our society so I very much doubt anything dodgy has occurred.

ever heard of one richard nixon
and i thank mike for his opinion tim but i seriously thought as a councillor of long standing he might be able to give us at least some clues to the process. i mean shit they couldnt just decide something of that magnitude and not survey thier licence buyers at least??oops shit sorry mike h to soon huh
i dont doubt its the first tim but id still like to know how it was done just in case theres a second

I can't blame the chairman for coming out and putting his views out there as there's a lot of shit flying around about them so they have to be able to offer their side.

thats the only side we are getting at the mo
how those censored emails arent a breach of the confidentiality agreement surprises me ?

I also stand by my statement that this sort of shit is the last thing F&G as a whole needs. I like your idea of the commissioner to be honest.

true enough but the last thing you want is government interference that would be just the excuse the f&g haters in power would need to gut f&g,s structure.
look at ecan and cera as examples.