Mike H, I am not going tit for tat. You have simply failed to convince anyone that there is an issue with the limited amount of lead that should be used on waterfowl. All you have said in reality is:
1. That the very vast majority of the submissions were against the change.
2. The studies that you have quoted are out of date and do not represent current lead usage.
3. In the absence of current figures you have used the old figures but not extrapolated the results to gauge estimated current effects.
4. Since you cannot produce any relevant information back your stance simply stated, "I'm here and get to vote."
Frankly your councils approach is so deeply flawed it's farcical.
Bookmarks