Thread: The results are in

Originally Posted by EeeBees

Was it Alice...in wonderland...things got curiouser and curiouser...oooopsss...

more like what a tangled web we weave EeBees.
here a little exercise for you voters/hb licence buyers search the minutes from aprill to june and see if you can find where the councill meet and voted on the numbers drop. good luck cos it dont exist..why aprill cos thats when elections nz were told apparently you,l see for yourself why june comes into it.

Originally Posted by gsp follower

if you can find where the councill meet and voted on the numbers drop. good luck cos it dont exist..why aprill cos thats when elections nz were told apparently you,l see for yourself why june comes into it.

There is one possible explanation, that confirmed minutes have been altered for some reason on the website? That could explain the need to access computers, and why there is no trace of a bone fide decision? But not why there would be a need to do such a thing. I doubt the incentive would be worth the consequence?

258- Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing documents with intent to deceive
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, with intent to obtain by deception any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, or to cause loss to any other person,

And yet they are now blaming the previous manager for not putting it on the June agenda. surely when the councillors receive the meeting agenda prior to the meeting that not a single one of them noticed it was on the agenda, that is just sloppy and just pure arrogance to blame someone else for their own failings.

Originally Posted by HB Hunting

And yet they are now blaming the previous manager for not putting it on the June agenda. surely when the councillors receive the meeting agenda prior to the meeting that not a single one of them noticed it was on the agenda, that is just sloppy and just pure arrogance to blame someone else for their own failings.

not the point elections nz were saying they were informed of the decision the morning after the aprill meeting.??
when clearly no decision had been rightfuly made
they,re digging themselves deeper holes with the switching dates of when it was muted discussed anywhere from 12 to 18 months.
problem is the damning evedence of the aprill 2015 minutes and no trail before or after??

258- Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing documents with intent to deceive
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, with intent to obtain by deception any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, or to cause loss to any other person,

if theres a confidentiality agreement tim between all parties what could the penalty for abandoning the listing vessel? and fessing up first?if such had happened..
im pickin a labour court case wouldnt prejudice a criminal one and for owning up or reporting criminal action the employment court couldnt dock you for such???.
h bayers ultimatly it is your axe to grind make yourselves heard in hb and wellington email is a wonderful easy thing.you can keep sending till you get a reply unless your emailing hb with the questions i asked tho it appears but numbers will tell it did against southland on a case of no consultation and nzc bypassing.

Tony H
Donor Member
*****
Offline


Browning, knocks em dead

Posts: 795
Napier
Gender
To all those people in Hawkes Bay, please attend the next council meeting at Fish & Game office Tue 20th of October at 6pm. There will be an item on the agenda to discuss the validity of the current councils decision to drop to 8 member's.
Be there to give your support or show your disagreement to this decision, either way you should attend. I have been informed that the media may be in attendance, See you there]

come on the bay and the maggies

Thanks GSP Follower, I have sent several requests for this exact information, when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office and what was their response's, did they know of the underhanded, backdoor politics used to get it through.
Its plain as day that they have completely Fk'd this up, but who else higher up gave them the ok to carry on, how far up the chain does this go. All this info is being passed over to the media.
This should serve notice to all the other councils around the country to make sure they do things by the book because the licence holders are watching

Originally Posted by HB Hunting

Thanks GSP Follower, I have sent several requests for this exact information, when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office and what was their response's, did they know of the underhanded, backdoor politics used to get it through.
Its plain as day that they have completely Fk'd this up, but who else higher up gave them the ok to carry on, how far up the chain does this go. All this info is being passed over to the media.
This should serve notice to all the other councils around the country to make sure they do things by the book because the licence holders are watching

good luck hb hunter i got 3 different stories from elections nz before i got what i hope is the truth but could just be the latest version of said truth.