Thread: The results are in

Originally Posted by HB Hunting

And yet they are now blaming the previous manager for not putting it on the June agenda. surely when the councillors receive the meeting agenda prior to the meeting that not a single one of them noticed it was on the agenda, that is just sloppy and just pure arrogance to blame someone else for their own failings.

not the point elections nz were saying they were informed of the decision the morning after the aprill meeting.??
when clearly no decision had been rightfuly made
they,re digging themselves deeper holes with the switching dates of when it was muted discussed anywhere from 12 to 18 months.
problem is the damning evedence of the aprill 2015 minutes and no trail before or after??

258- Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing documents with intent to deceive
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years who, with intent to obtain by deception any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, or to cause loss to any other person,

if theres a confidentiality agreement tim between all parties what could the penalty for abandoning the listing vessel? and fessing up first?if such had happened..
im pickin a labour court case wouldnt prejudice a criminal one and for owning up or reporting criminal action the employment court couldnt dock you for such???.
h bayers ultimatly it is your axe to grind make yourselves heard in hb and wellington email is a wonderful easy thing.you can keep sending till you get a reply unless your emailing hb with the questions i asked tho it appears but numbers will tell it did against southland on a case of no consultation and nzc bypassing.

Tony H
Donor Member
*****
Offline


Browning, knocks em dead

Posts: 795
Napier
Gender
To all those people in Hawkes Bay, please attend the next council meeting at Fish & Game office Tue 20th of October at 6pm. There will be an item on the agenda to discuss the validity of the current councils decision to drop to 8 member's.
Be there to give your support or show your disagreement to this decision, either way you should attend. I have been informed that the media may be in attendance, See you there]

come on the bay and the maggies

Thanks GSP Follower, I have sent several requests for this exact information, when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office and what was their response's, did they know of the underhanded, backdoor politics used to get it through.
Its plain as day that they have completely Fk'd this up, but who else higher up gave them the ok to carry on, how far up the chain does this go. All this info is being passed over to the media.
This should serve notice to all the other councils around the country to make sure they do things by the book because the licence holders are watching

Originally Posted by HB Hunting

Thanks GSP Follower, I have sent several requests for this exact information, when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office and what was their response's, did they know of the underhanded, backdoor politics used to get it through.
Its plain as day that they have completely Fk'd this up, but who else higher up gave them the ok to carry on, how far up the chain does this go. All this info is being passed over to the media.
This should serve notice to all the other councils around the country to make sure they do things by the book because the licence holders are watching

good luck hb hunter i got 3 different stories from elections nz before i got what i hope is the truth but could just be the latest version of said truth.

Yes there seems to be a lot of that going around, and people are looking to cover their own rear ends, so as not to be exposed by the actions of this council.
But as they say "the truth will win out in the end"
If you go to only one meeting this needs to be the one that people need to attend and bring this council to task, these people have forgotten what they are there for.

when did the council inform Election NZ and the national office

the councill didnt the manager did at least that the evidence i have.
who authorised him or gave him that impression god knows again no paper trail..
but as to if its being played for the benefit of several parties with multiple scapegoats each thinking the other is the patsy that could be the 64,000 $ question.

"the truth will win out in the end"

hopefuly but i suspect what could be a even more costly gag order employment agreement might stymie that.
its hard to see thier endgame but believe me its there.
but you guys taking back your region would stuff all the games.
getting eastern councill well away from the region would be one of my 2nd moves.
you will find a substancial cost hAS BEEN INCURRED before you even get the truth.

ALL THE BEST TO YOU ALL.

At the April meeting we again discussed it and voted unanimously to move to 8 councillors for the 2015 elections, but it wasn’t included in that meeting’s agenda. The Manager was instructed to include it as an agenda’d item in the next meeting in June.

so important and forward thinking and licence buyer friendly it wasnt even in the minutes niether was any mention of consultation which i doubt was given a 2nd thought
why is that the only proposal or vote not in the minutes something that ground breaking would at least be recorded as proposed seconded but a unanimous vote not even recorded.??
yet again not even recorded in the summary of resolutions this groundbreaking nzc inspired bit of public minded cost saving licencee minded altruism in action??
pull the other one it plays dixie.
why would it need to be on the june agenda what were you gonna do vote on it twice ????
i could understand it if you were gonna take time to consult your licence buyers but no you ''voted unanimously''tui,s anyone